2021
DOI: 10.4193/rhin20.540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of two grading systems for epistaxis in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Different institutions use different grading systems for hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT)-associated epistaxis. It is important to have a universal, standardized grading system to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of different treatment options. We introduced the “Intensity, Frequency and need for Blood Transfusion” (IFT) grading system for HHT-associated epistaxis in 2008. Hoag et al. proposed the “Epistaxis Severity Score” (ESS) for the International HHT foundation in 2010. This … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The epistaxis grade was evaluated using the Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) 32 and the Epistaxis Intensity, Frequency, and Need for Blood Transfusion Score (IFT). 33,34 Blood tests were collected with each consultation or treatment and screened for coagulation factors VIII and IX, vWF antigen and activity, hemoglobin, ferritin, iron, and C-reactive protein (CRP). However, the measurements of FIX and vWF were not performed for all patients.…”
Section: Methods and Study Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The epistaxis grade was evaluated using the Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) 32 and the Epistaxis Intensity, Frequency, and Need for Blood Transfusion Score (IFT). 33,34 Blood tests were collected with each consultation or treatment and screened for coagulation factors VIII and IX, vWF antigen and activity, hemoglobin, ferritin, iron, and C-reactive protein (CRP). However, the measurements of FIX and vWF were not performed for all patients.…”
Section: Methods and Study Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The epistaxis grade was evaluated using the Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) 32 and the Epistaxis Intensity, Frequency, and Need for Blood Transfusion Score (IFT). 33 , 34 …”
Section: Methods and Study Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) is a gold-standard, patient-reported outcome measure specifically designed to evaluate nosebleed severity in patients with Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) [ 18 ]. It was proposed by Hoag et al for the International HHT Foundation in 2010 and has been used in various studies to assess the severity and impact of epistaxis in HHT patients [ 19 ]. This score is typically documented in patient charts and is confirmed based on documented patient histories [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%