2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12646-017-0432-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Shifting Ability, Inhibitory Control and Working Memory in Monolingual and Bilingual Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Behavioural studies with infants constitute a small portion of this research, but the published studies consistently indicate better attentional control for infants in bilingual environments than for those in monolingual environments (Comishen, Bialystok, and Adler, 2019;Kovacs and Mehler, 2009;Weikum et al, 2007). Studies with young children performing simple executive function tasks primarily indicate better performance by bilinguals (Carlson and Meltzoff, 2008;Martin-Rhee and Bialystok, 2008;Mehrani and Zabihi, 2017;Yang, Yang, and Lust, 2011) but other studies with this age group show no group difference (Dunabeitia et al, 2014;Gathercole et al, 2014). The balance shifts in studies with young adults where most behavioural studies show no differences in performance levels for monolingual and bilingual participants (Bialystok, Martin, and Viswanathan, 2005;Paap and Greenberg, 2013;von Bastian, Souza, and Gade, 2016), reporting group differences only when tasks are made more difficult (Bialystok, 2006;Costa et al, 2009).…”
Section: Cognitive Consequences Of Bilingualismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Behavioural studies with infants constitute a small portion of this research, but the published studies consistently indicate better attentional control for infants in bilingual environments than for those in monolingual environments (Comishen, Bialystok, and Adler, 2019;Kovacs and Mehler, 2009;Weikum et al, 2007). Studies with young children performing simple executive function tasks primarily indicate better performance by bilinguals (Carlson and Meltzoff, 2008;Martin-Rhee and Bialystok, 2008;Mehrani and Zabihi, 2017;Yang, Yang, and Lust, 2011) but other studies with this age group show no group difference (Dunabeitia et al, 2014;Gathercole et al, 2014). The balance shifts in studies with young adults where most behavioural studies show no differences in performance levels for monolingual and bilingual participants (Bialystok, Martin, and Viswanathan, 2005;Paap and Greenberg, 2013;von Bastian, Souza, and Gade, 2016), reporting group differences only when tasks are made more difficult (Bialystok, 2006;Costa et al, 2009).…”
Section: Cognitive Consequences Of Bilingualismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One of these articles tested both preschool-aged and adolescent participants (Gathercole, Thomas, Viñas Guasch, Kennedy, Prys, Young, et al, 2016), and is also discussed in the adolescent section of our Results. As summarized in Barac, Moreno, & Bialystok, 2016;Bialystok, 1999;Bialystok & Martin, 2004, Studies 1, 2, and 3; Carlson & Meltzoff, 2008;Diaz & Farrar, 2018a;Diaz & Farrar, 2018b;Dicataldo & Roch, 2020;Gathercole et al, 2016;Goldman, Negen, & Sarnecka, 2014;Haft et al, 2019;Leikin & Tovli, 2014;Mehrani & Zabihi, 2017;Namazi & Thordardottir, 2010;Nguyen & Astington, 2014;Tran, Arredondo, & Yoshida, 2015;Tran, Arredondo, & Yoshida, 2019;Yoshida, Tran, Benitez, & Kuwabara, 2010;Yoshida, Tran, Benitez, & Kuwabara, 2011).…”
Section: Target Cognitive Abilities and Cognitive Tasks Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibitory control and response inhibition were assessed in 14 experiments using the child ANT (Carlson & Meltzoff, 2008), a visually cued recall task (Carlson & Meltzoff, 2008), the Kansas Reflection/Impulsivity Scale (KRISP; Carlson & Meltzoff, 2008), the Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (C-TONI; Carlson & Meltzoff, 2008), the Statue task (Carlson & Meltzoff, 2008), the Delay of Gratification task (Carlson & Meltzoff, 2008), Stroop and 'Strooplike' (Day/Night, Happy/Sad) tasks (Diaz & Farrar, 2018a;Diaz & Farrar, 2018b;Dicataldo & Roch, 2020;Nguyen & Astington, 2014;Tran et al, 2019), Simon Says and Bear/Dragon Simon Says tasks (Carlson & Meltzoff, 2008;Diaz & Farrar, 2018a;Diaz & Farrar, 2018b;Tran et al, 2019), the Simon task ('interference suppression', Gathercole et al, 2016;Mehrani & Zabihi, 2017), the Gift delay task (Barac et al, 2016;Carlson & Meltzoff, 2008;Tran et al, 2019), a Go/No-Go task (Barac et al, 2016), and a non-symbolic numerical discrimination task (Goldman et al, 2014). The Dimensional Change Card Sort task (DCCS) was also used to measure inhibition (Aktan-Erciyes, 2020, Studies 1 and 2; Bialystok, 1999;Bialystok & Martin, 2004, Studies 1, 2, and 3;Carlson & Meltzoff, 2008;Tran et al, 2019); this task was additionally used as a measure of cognitive flexibility in three experiments (Diaz & Farrar, 2018a;Diaz & Farrar, 2018b;Haft et al, 2019), shifting in five experiments ('switching', Aktan-Erciyes, 2020, Studies BILINGUAL CHILDHOOD COGNITIVE MEASURES 20 1 and 2; 'attention-shifting', Dicataldo & Roch, 2020...…”
Section: Bilingual Childhood Cognitive Measures 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations