21st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference 2017
DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-2190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of elliptical and round scramjet combustors by Improved Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation

Abstract: To explore the combustion performance of non-rectangular type supersonic combustors, the flow and combustion characteristics in round and round-to-elliptic shape-transition (RdEST) supersonic combustors under the same configurations of flight Mach number and fuel equivalence ratio were compared based on modeling results. The fuel equivalence ratio is maintained the same as 0.8, while two inlet Mach numbers of 2.5 and 3.0 both corresponding to a real flight Mach number of 6.5 are tested. To alleviate the strict… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time-integration is advanced by the second-order Crank-Nicholson scheme . Details of the numerical methods can refer to Wu et al The code has been extensively validated for nonreactive highly underexpanded jets and supersonic combustions. , …”
Section: Scramjet Combustor Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The time-integration is advanced by the second-order Crank-Nicholson scheme . Details of the numerical methods can refer to Wu et al The code has been extensively validated for nonreactive highly underexpanded jets and supersonic combustions. , …”
Section: Scramjet Combustor Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hui et al and Wang et al compared the capability of the skeletal mechanism in predicting the pressure profiles in HCCI-like engine and compression ignition engine simulation. For scramjet combustor modeling, Yao et al validated the second level of mechanism fidelity by comparing with the experimental pressure distribution which is often the only available data from scramjet experiments. The above levels of fidelity validations care about only the steady statuses, while the third level of fidelity validation cares about the accurate predictions of intermediate species when the modeling focuses on unsteady combustion processes, such as the ignition and flame stabilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation