2013
DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2012.736649
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Count Models: Application to Pedestrian-Vehicle Crashes Along Malaysia Federal Roads

Abstract: The results indicated the presence of overdispersion in the pedestrian crashes (PCs) and showed that it is due to excess zero rather than variability in the crash data. To handle the issue, the hurdle Poisson model was found to be the best model among the considered models in terms of comparative measures. Moreover, the variables average daily traffic, heavy vehicle traffic, speed limit, land use, and area type were significantly associated with PCs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considerable studies have been conducted on estimating pedestrian crash prediction models (Lee and Abdel-Aty, 2005;Al-Ghamdi, 2002;Garder, 2004;Zajac and Ivan, 2003;Lyon and Persaud, 2002;Hosseinpour et al, 2013). Some have focused on understanding pedestrian safety problems at signalized intersections with different types of pedestrian crossing behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable studies have been conducted on estimating pedestrian crash prediction models (Lee and Abdel-Aty, 2005;Al-Ghamdi, 2002;Garder, 2004;Zajac and Ivan, 2003;Lyon and Persaud, 2002;Hosseinpour et al, 2013). Some have focused on understanding pedestrian safety problems at signalized intersections with different types of pedestrian crossing behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative to zero-inflated models, hurdle models have some inherent advantages on model assumptions. By relaxing the structural zero assumption, hurdle models assume that all zeroes in the crash data are sampling zeroes [29,30,31,32]. In contrast to the structural zero assumption presuming an inherently safe condition with no crashes, sampling zero assumption implies that all segments have crash potential and the zero state does not remain permanently on any road segment [29,30,31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By relaxing the structural zero assumption, hurdle models assume that all zeroes in the crash data are sampling zeroes [29,30,31,32]. In contrast to the structural zero assumption presuming an inherently safe condition with no crashes, sampling zero assumption implies that all segments have crash potential and the zero state does not remain permanently on any road segment [29,30,31,32]. Existing crash studies using hurdle models [29,30,31,32,33] were primarily developed based on cross-sectional data (as opposed to panel data) and did not consider random effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they have rarely been adopted in road safety literature (Boucher, Santolino 2010;Hosseinpour et al 2013;Son et al 2011). …”
Section: Hurdle Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%