2014
DOI: 10.2138/am.2014.4620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of the mechanical behavior of carbon dioxide and methane hydrate-bearing sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 shows the relationship between the failure strength and confining pressure for the hydrate-bearing sediments containing ice, which dissociated by depressurization or heating method under different exhaust conditions. The results indicate that the failure strength clearly increases with increasing confining pressure, which is accordant with our previous study [26][27][28]. The reason for this behavior is that pore fissure being closed under higher confining pressures, which prevents crack propagation in the sediments.…”
Section: Failure Strengthsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…3 shows the relationship between the failure strength and confining pressure for the hydrate-bearing sediments containing ice, which dissociated by depressurization or heating method under different exhaust conditions. The results indicate that the failure strength clearly increases with increasing confining pressure, which is accordant with our previous study [26][27][28]. The reason for this behavior is that pore fissure being closed under higher confining pressures, which prevents crack propagation in the sediments.…”
Section: Failure Strengthsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The mechanical properties of the hydrate-bearing sediments were extremely sensitive to temperature, confining pressure, strain rate, and porosity [24]. Considering the actual burial conditions of the hydrate-bearing sediments in reservoirs located in Qilian Mountain, the hydrate existed in layers in which the drilling depth ranged from 0 m to 400 m, the temperature ranged from about −10 • C to −1.8 • C, and the hydrate fractions in the drilling core mostly focused on 25-36%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More CH4 hydrate was dissociated than CO2 hydrate due to their dynamic stability differences, which decreased the strength of the sample [31]. show clearly that the failure strength of the CO 2 hydrate-bearing sediments is higher than that of the CH 4 hydrate sediments under different confining pressures, and CH 4 -CO 2 replacement is beneficial to the stability of the reservoir [23,24]. Besides this, in the shear process, the strength of the hydrate-bearing sediments may consist of the strength of ice, hydrate, and sediment matrix and their interaction [29].…”
Section: The Effect Of Confining Pressurementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the CH 4 -CO 2 exchange process involves the formation of CO 2 hydrate during the exploitation, a recent work compared the difference in mechanical strength between CO 2 and CH 4 hydrate bearing sediments [232]. The preliminary study reported that the synthetic CO 2 hydrate could maintain the mechanical stability of reservoir during CH 4 -CO 2 gas exchange provided that they are well distributed in the pore space.…”
Section: Mechanical Strength Of Hydrates In Naturementioning
confidence: 99%