2020
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202001089
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Combined Ordered Macro‐Mesoporous Architecture Design and Surface Engineering Strategy for High‐Performance Sulfur Immobilizer in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Abstract: The practical application of lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries is hindered by the “shuttle” of lithium polysulfides (LiPS) and sluggish Li–S kinetics issues. Herein, a synergistic strategy combining mesoporous architecture design and defect engineering is proposed to synthesize multifunctional defective 3D ordered mesoporous cobalt sulfide (3DOM N‐Co9S8−x) to address the shuttling and sluggish reaction kinetics of polysulfide in Li–S batteries. The unique 3DOM design provides abundant voids for sulfur storage an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficient catalysis effect of SC‐TiO 2 ‐Hal enables the Li‐S battery to deliver the highest discharge capacity of 1037.6 mAh g −1 at 0.2 C compared with SC‐TiO 2 /S (793.1 mAh g −1 ) and SC‐Hal/S (629.9 mAh g −1 ), and the reversible capacity of 566.9 mAh g −1 at 5 C. Especially for SC‐Hal/S, decreased sharply between 0.2 and 0.5 C, which might be due to the low electrical conductivity (Figure S19, Supporting Information), leading to the poor rate capabilities. [ 26 ] In comparison, SC‐TiO 2 /S and SC‐Hal/S can only reach the discharge capacity of 317.0 and 94.3 mAh g −1 at 5 C, respectively. When the current shifts back to 0.2 C, the discharge capacity of SC‐TiO 2 ‐Hal/S is rapidly recuperative compared with SC‐TiO 2 /S and SC‐Hal/S, implying that downshift O p‐band center can accelerate catalytic conversion kinetics for LiPSs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficient catalysis effect of SC‐TiO 2 ‐Hal enables the Li‐S battery to deliver the highest discharge capacity of 1037.6 mAh g −1 at 0.2 C compared with SC‐TiO 2 /S (793.1 mAh g −1 ) and SC‐Hal/S (629.9 mAh g −1 ), and the reversible capacity of 566.9 mAh g −1 at 5 C. Especially for SC‐Hal/S, decreased sharply between 0.2 and 0.5 C, which might be due to the low electrical conductivity (Figure S19, Supporting Information), leading to the poor rate capabilities. [ 26 ] In comparison, SC‐TiO 2 /S and SC‐Hal/S can only reach the discharge capacity of 317.0 and 94.3 mAh g −1 at 5 C, respectively. When the current shifts back to 0.2 C, the discharge capacity of SC‐TiO 2 ‐Hal/S is rapidly recuperative compared with SC‐TiO 2 /S and SC‐Hal/S, implying that downshift O p‐band center can accelerate catalytic conversion kinetics for LiPSs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[104][105][106] Recently, vacancy engineering has stimulated an immerse interest in boosting the chemical entrapment and catalytic conversion of PS in Li-S system. [107][108][109][110] In this section, the fabrication and characterization of vacancy are introduced, followed by the discussion on the essential role of vacancy played in accelerating Li-S chemistry from experimental analysis and theoretical simulation. The optimized electronic structure via vacancy engineering is also covered to better understand the sulfur redox chemistry at an atomic scale.…”
Section: Vacancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, mesopore can also strongly inhibit the LiPSs shuttle via physical confinement at the cost of decreased sulfur loading compared to macropore. Various mesoporous carbon 68,70 /metal-based 69 hosts alongside a tailored degree of pore ordering 71,72 were synthesized by different methods (hard/soft template), and the resultant composite cathodes demonstrated significant performance improvements.…”
Section: Pore Structure Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%