2016
DOI: 10.3934/nhm.2016.11.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined finite volume - finite element scheme for a dispersive shallow water system

Abstract: Lagrange multiplier of the incompressibility constraint and p can be expressed, for free surface flows, as a function of the water depth of the fluid. Therefore, the hydrostatic assumption implies that the resulting model, even though it describes an incompressible fluid, has common features with models arising in compressible fluid mechanics.In geophysical problems, the hydrostatic assumption coupled with a shallow water type description of the flow is often used. Unfortunately, these models do not represent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, thanks to the formulation (), the advection (left‐hand side) of the vertical velocity is solved by conventional passive transport scheme. This strategy has already been used in the work of Aissiouene et al and entropy‐satisfying schemes to solve it can be used . However, in the cited works, the dispersion step is solved using a prediction‐correction strategy based on an implicit system on the hydrodynamic pressure q B .…”
Section: Numerical Schemes For the Reduced Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, thanks to the formulation (), the advection (left‐hand side) of the vertical velocity is solved by conventional passive transport scheme. This strategy has already been used in the work of Aissiouene et al and entropy‐satisfying schemes to solve it can be used . However, in the cited works, the dispersion step is solved using a prediction‐correction strategy based on an implicit system on the hydrodynamic pressure q B .…”
Section: Numerical Schemes For the Reduced Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, by neglecting the dispersal operator D NH , the first two unknowns of U NH are estimated using , whereas the third is simply advected to the flow as a passive pollutant . This strategy was already used for dispersive model in the work of Aissiouene et al We write UkNH,n=UkNH,nδtn||kfdouble-struckFk()scriptFfNH,n·scriptNkk_f+scriptSf,kNH,n||f, with the state vector UkNH,n=()UkSW,n,.1emhkntruewknt, the source term scriptSf,kNH,n=()scriptSf,kSW,n,0t, the numerical flux FfNH,n·Nkktrue_f=scriptFfSW,n·scriptNkk_fscriptFδup()scriptF<...>…”
Section: Numerical Schemes For the Reduced Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this system, our scheme is second order accurate in time and, if we use a reconstruction algorithm [3] in the hyperbolic step, it is formally second order accurate in space [3,2] . In the application, we use a kinetic solver for its good mathematical properties.…”
Section: The Averaged Euler Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, we consider the equations (14)-(15) as a mixed problem [2] and, starting with an appropriate variational formulation of the problem, we apply the finite element method to obtain the pressure p n+1 which is solution of an elliptic equation and the velocity u n+1 . The elliptic equation of the pressure can be written under the form:…”
Section: The Averaged Euler Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%