IEEE Power Engineering Society. 1999 Winter Meeting (Cat. No.99CH36233) 1999
DOI: 10.1109/pesw.1999.747476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combined ANN and expert system tool for transformer fault diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, it is essential to explore the principles, methods and means from various disciplines that are helpful to the fault diagnosis of transformers, so as to make the fault diagnosis technology interdisciplinary. Aiming at the limitations of traditional methods above, with the rapid development of computer technology and artificial intelligence (AI) theory, multiple intelligence techniques, including artificial neural network (ANN) [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], expert system (EPS) [47][48][49][50][51], fuzzy theory [52][53][54][55][56][57][58], rough sets theory (RST) [36], grey system theory (GST) [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66], and other intelligent diagnosis tools [5, such as swarm intelligence (SI) algorithm, data mining technology, machine learning (ML), mathematical statistics method, wavelet analysis (WA), optimized neural network, Bayesian network (BN), and evidential reasoning approach, have been introduced to the research field of transformer fault diagnosis based on the DGA approach. These intelligent methods make up for the deficiencies of the mentioned traditional DGA methods, and directly or indirectly improve the accuracy of transformer fault diagnosis, and provide a new train of thought for high-precision transformer fault diagnosis.…”
Section: Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, it is essential to explore the principles, methods and means from various disciplines that are helpful to the fault diagnosis of transformers, so as to make the fault diagnosis technology interdisciplinary. Aiming at the limitations of traditional methods above, with the rapid development of computer technology and artificial intelligence (AI) theory, multiple intelligence techniques, including artificial neural network (ANN) [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], expert system (EPS) [47][48][49][50][51], fuzzy theory [52][53][54][55][56][57][58], rough sets theory (RST) [36], grey system theory (GST) [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66], and other intelligent diagnosis tools [5, such as swarm intelligence (SI) algorithm, data mining technology, machine learning (ML), mathematical statistics method, wavelet analysis (WA), optimized neural network, Bayesian network (BN), and evidential reasoning approach, have been introduced to the research field of transformer fault diagnosis based on the DGA approach. These intelligent methods make up for the deficiencies of the mentioned traditional DGA methods, and directly or indirectly improve the accuracy of transformer fault diagnosis, and provide a new train of thought for high-precision transformer fault diagnosis.…”
Section: Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the EPS is considered one of the main forms of AI and the most active and extensive application fields in the application research of AI. Hence, in view of the professionalism, empiricism and complexity of transformer fault diagnosis, the application of EPS-based diagnosis methods has unique advantages [47][48][49][50][51]. Recently, several other approaches or techniques have been proposed for fault diagnosis of transformers, such as Rigatos and Siano's [82] proposed neural modeling and local statistical approach to fault diagnosis for the detection of incipient faults in power transformers, which can detect transformer failures at their early stages and consequently can deter critical conditions for the power grid; Shah and Bhalja [85] and Bacha et al [5] both proposed support vector machine (SVM)-based intelligent fault classification approaches to power transformer DGA.…”
Section: Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nowadays, the diagnostic methods that are most applied by maintenance engineering personnel, referred to here as classical diagnostic methods, are described at the standards IEC 60599 (IEC, 2007) Recently, most efforts in this area have been devoted to the development of the so-called intelligent or expert diagnostic systems and numerous papers have been published on this subject over the years (Lowe, 1985;Barrett, 1989;Tomsovic et al, 1993;Zhang et al, 1996;Wang and Liu, 1998;Huang, 2003;Fei and Zhang, 2009;Wu et al, 2011;Miranda et al, 2012). The expert systems try to improve the classical methods' performances, commonly by combining the responses of two or more of these methods and/or applying artificial intelligence techniques to empirical databases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of them are techniques (Dukarm, 1993;Zhang et al, 1996;Yang and Huang, 1998;Wang et al, 1998;Guardado et al, 2001;Huang, 2003;Miranda and Castro, 2005;Naresh et al, 2008;Chen et al, 2009) built around a feed-forward neural-network classifier, that is also called Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and that will be explained in the paper. Some of these papers introduce further enhancements to the MLP: in particular, neural networks that are run in parallel to an expert system in Wang et al (1998), Wavelet Networks (that is, neural nets with a wavelet-based feature extraction) in Chen et al (2009), Self-Organizing Polynomial Networks in Yang andHuang (1998) and Fuzzy Networks in Dukarm (1993), Huang (2003), Miranda and Castro (2005), and Naresh et al (2008). Several studies (Dukarm, 1993;Huang et al, 1997;Huang, 2003;Miranda and Castro, 2005;Naresh et al, 2008;Chen et al, 2009) resort to fuzzy logic (Huang, 2003) when modeling the decision functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%