2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A combination of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay and centromeric identification for evaluation of the genotoxicity of dicamba

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As similar to the our results, the cytotoxic/cytostatic effects of some different synthetic auxins were reported in the previous studies performed on various test systems (Di Paolo et al 2001;Tuschl and Schwab 2003;Mičić et al 2004;Gonzàlez et al 2006Gonzàlez et al , 2007Gonzàlez et al , 2011.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As similar to the our results, the cytotoxic/cytostatic effects of some different synthetic auxins were reported in the previous studies performed on various test systems (Di Paolo et al 2001;Tuschl and Schwab 2003;Mičić et al 2004;Gonzàlez et al 2006Gonzàlez et al , 2007Gonzàlez et al , 2011.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Similar results were also reported by Zeljezic and Garaj-Vrhovac (2004), who observed that deberhan A, a commercial formulation of 2,4-D, caused an increase in chromatid and chromosome breaks, number of MNi and number of NBUDs in human PBLs. Gonzàlez et al (2011) found that dicamba and one of its commercial formulation banvel induced a significant increase in MN and NBUD formation at a concentration range of 50-500 lg/mL in Chinese hamster ovary cells. The damaging activity of dicamba in different mammalian cell targets was also previously observed by the same research group (Gonzàlez et al 2006(Gonzàlez et al , 2007(Gonzàlez et al , 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The use of in vitro cell cultures for genotoxic and cytotoxic evaluation is rather economic and they are highly sensitive methods for the early detection of chemical exposure and toxicity (DiPaolo et al 1981). Among them, one of the most used system for clastogenic and/or aneugenic screening is the micronucleus assay in human peripheral blood lymphocytes (Ali et al 2011;González et al 2011;Nikoloff et al 2012b;Soloneski et al 2008;Vera-Candioti et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%