1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00040-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cognitive theory of obsessions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

32
379
1
26

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 929 publications
(443 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
32
379
1
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, some authors argue that if the mechanism of change (i.e., change in cognitions) is directly targeted (i.e., through cognitive interventions), treatment effects will be larger (Clark, 1999;Rachman, 1997). Several empirical studies confirm that the use of cognitive interventions (slightly) enhances treatment outcome (Bryant et al, 2008;Clark et al, 2006;Mattick, Peters, & Clarke, 1989;McMillan & Lee, 2010;Salkovskis, Hackman, Wells, Gelder, & Clark, 2007).…”
Section: Pathways To Change In One-session Exposure With and Without mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, some authors argue that if the mechanism of change (i.e., change in cognitions) is directly targeted (i.e., through cognitive interventions), treatment effects will be larger (Clark, 1999;Rachman, 1997). Several empirical studies confirm that the use of cognitive interventions (slightly) enhances treatment outcome (Bryant et al, 2008;Clark et al, 2006;Mattick, Peters, & Clarke, 1989;McMillan & Lee, 2010;Salkovskis, Hackman, Wells, Gelder, & Clark, 2007).…”
Section: Pathways To Change In One-session Exposure With and Without mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need of overcoming these limitations led cognitive authors to focus on the distorted thoughts and dysfunctional beliefs, which were present in some degree in most OCD patients. [21][22][23][24][25][26] It was consensually proposed their distribution in six domains: tendency to overestimate the risk and the responsibility; the importance and the power of thoughts and the need of controlling them; the need of certainty; and perfectionism. 27 This proposal led to explanation models about the origin of OC symptoms based on the cognitive theory, to the development of tools to identify and measure the intensity of dysfunctional beliefs in OCD, to verify their association with OC symptoms, and techniques for correcting them.…”
Section: The Cognitive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the lower the importance patients attribute to their intrusive thoughts, the lower the impulse to perform rituals. [21][22][23][24][25] 2) Cognitive theory for the origin of compulsions A complement to this theory was proposed by Rachman 29 in order to explain the origin of compulsions. Based on Salkovskis' proposal that the overvalued responsibility would be the central issue in OCD, Rachman proposed an explanative hypothesis for the origin of compulsions.…”
Section: Cognitive Theory For Oc Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, Purdon, Rowa, and Antony (2007) asked OCD patients to keep a detailed diary of their suppression attempts over a three-day period and found that individuals with OCD indeed engage in frequent, effortful, unsuccessful suppression of unwanted thoughts. According to the cognitive-behavioral perspective on OCD (Rachman, 1997;Salkovskis, 1985), the intrusive thoughts that characterize many psychological disorders Hidden Complications 7 may persist because of faulty pre-existing beliefs, faulty interpretations of intrusions, and futile efforts to suppress the intrusive thoughts.…”
Section: Anxiety Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, Purdon, Rowa, and Antony (2007) asked OCD patients to keep a detailed diary of their suppression attempts over a three-day period and found that individuals with OCD indeed engage in frequent, effortful, unsuccessful suppression of unwanted thoughts. According to the cognitive-behavioral perspective on OCD (Rachman, 1997;Salkovskis, 1985), the intrusive thoughts that characterize many psychological disorders Hidden Complications 7 may persist because of faulty pre-existing beliefs, faulty interpretations of intrusions, and futile efforts to suppress the intrusive thoughts.The counterproductive effects of suppressing negative, intrusive thoughts in non-clinical samples have been observed fairly consistently (for exceptions, see Kelly & Kahn, 1994;Purdon & Clark, 2001). In a series of studies using non-clinical analogue samples, Salkovskis and colleagues (Salkovskis & Campbell, 1994;Salkovskis & Reynolds, 1994;Trinder & Salkovskis, 1994) observed a suppression-related increase in intrusive thoughts both in the lab and over a four-day naturalistic follow-up.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%