2015
DOI: 10.11113/jt.v77.6491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Clustered Semantic Graph Approach for Multi-Document Abstractive Summarization

Abstract: Multi-document abstractive summarization aims is to create a compact version of the source text and preserves the important information. The existing graph based methods rely on Bag of Words approach, which treats sentence as bag of words and relies on content similarity measure. The obvious limitation of Bag of Words approach is that it ignores semantic relationships among words and thus the summary produced from the source text would not be adequate. This paper proposes a clustered semantic graph based appro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiment of this study is performed using DUC-2002, a standard corpus for text summarization. Experimental results reveal that the proposed approach outperforms other summarization systems [4]…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Experiment of this study is performed using DUC-2002, a standard corpus for text summarization. Experimental results reveal that the proposed approach outperforms other summarization systems [4]…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This method extracts sentences that Coverage is guaranteed by ranking sentences by their degree of connection to other topic sentences and phrases. Khan et al present a clustered semantic graph approach for multi-document abstractive summarization [21]. Most of the existing graph-based methods rely on the bag of words method, which treats sentences as a bag of words and relies on a content similarity measure.…”
Section: -3-graph-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bagi menghasilkan sebuah ringkasan, kebanyakan model peringkasan yang sedia ada sering menggunakan kaedah perwakilan teks yang asas, iaitu menggunakan model bahasa tradisional seperti Bag-of-Words (BOW) bagi mewakili setiap istilah dalam teks yang dijadikan sebagai vektor kata kunci n-dimensi seperti yang terdapat dalam (Conroy, Schlesinger, O'leary, & Goldstein, 2006). Sementara itu, terdapat model-model peringkasan yang lain telah mengeksploitasi model kebarangkalian model N-gram sebagai fitur ayat (Clarke & Lapata, 2008) dan ada juga yang mewakilkan model N-gram tersebut dalam bentuk graf (Ganesan, Zhai, & Han, 2010;Khan, Salim, Reafee, Sukprasert, & Kumar, 2015;Van Lierde & Chow, 2019). Walau bagaimanapun, terdapat beberapa isu ketara di dalam model-model bahasa ini seperti perwakilan semantik yang kurang tepat dan maksud perkataan yang terpesong.…”
Section: Kaedah Perwakilan Teksunclassified