2019
DOI: 10.1101/2019.12.19.871897
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A clinically and genomically annotated nerve sheath tumor biospecimen repository

Abstract: Nerve sheath tumors occur as a heterogeneous group of neoplasms in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). The malignant form represents the most common cause of death in people with NF1, and even when benign, these tumors can result in significant disfigurement, neurologic dysfunction, and a range of profound symptoms. Lack of human tissue across the peripheral nerve tumors common in NF1 has been a major limitation in the development of new therapies. To address this unmet need, we have created an annot… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

7
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Links to specific datasets and the access teams required to download them can be found using Synapse ID syn21221980. Genomic variant data were collected from exome-Seq [37] or whole-genome sequencing [38]. Variant call format (VCF) files were processed using "vcf2maf" (https://github.com/mskcc/vcf2maf) according to the workflow located at https://github.com/Sage-Bionetworks/rare-disease-workflows/ tree/master/gene-variant-workflow and then uploaded to the NF Data Portal.…”
Section: Sequencing Data Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Links to specific datasets and the access teams required to download them can be found using Synapse ID syn21221980. Genomic variant data were collected from exome-Seq [37] or whole-genome sequencing [38]. Variant call format (VCF) files were processed using "vcf2maf" (https://github.com/mskcc/vcf2maf) according to the workflow located at https://github.com/Sage-Bionetworks/rare-disease-workflows/ tree/master/gene-variant-workflow and then uploaded to the NF Data Portal.…”
Section: Sequencing Data Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the diversity of the nerve sheath tumors at the transcriptomic level, we re-processed RNA-seq data from three published datasets [37][38][39] and one unpublished dataset. Despite having four types of nerve sheath tumors (cNFs, pNFs, NFs, and MPNSTs) across four datasets, we observed confounding batch effects ( Figure 1A) as some tumor types (e.g., cNF and NF) were derived from separate studies.…”
Section: Pan-nf Transcriptomic Analysis Identified Most Variable Latementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the diversity of the nerve sheath tumors at the transcriptomic level, we re-processed RNA-seq data from three published datasets [33][34][35] and one unpublished dataset. Despite having four types of nerve sheath tumors (cNFs, pNFs, NFs and MPNSTs) across four datasets, we observed confounding batch effects ( Figure 1A) as some tumor types (eg.…”
Section: Pan-nf Transcriptomic Analysis Identifies Most Variable Latementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Links to specific datasets and the access teams required to download them can be found using Synapse ID syn21221980 . Genomic variant data was collected from exome-Seq [35] or whole-genome sequencing [33] . VCFs were processed via vcf2maf ( https://github.com/mskcc/vcf2maf ) according to the workflow located at https://github.com/Sage-Bionetworks/rare-disease-workflows/tree/master/gene-variant-workflow and then uploaded to the NF Data Portal.…”
Section: Sequencing Data Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to con rm whether CNFs and PNFs are genomically and transcriptomically distinct lesions using advanced sequencing techniques, we compared publicly available RNAseq data from an NF1 test cohort where cutaneous/non-plexiform neuro bromas were compared to PNFs 16 . Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of the RNA-seq data con rmed that histologically identical cutaneous CNFs and PNFs cannot be discriminated based on global gene expression pro les, largely due to transcript heterogeneity (Fig.…”
Section: Cnfs and Pnfs Have Distinct Global Methylation Pro Lesmentioning
confidence: 99%