2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A clinical randomized study on the effects of invasive monitoring on burn shock resuscitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
79
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
79
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although goal-directed treatment has been advocated in septic patients in the past [16], recent data from the ProCESS study could not confirm this and, as such, this cannot be recommended in burn patients [17]. This is supported by previous reports showing that volumetric monitoring may lead to even higher resuscitation volumes and possible adverse effects [18].…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although goal-directed treatment has been advocated in septic patients in the past [16], recent data from the ProCESS study could not confirm this and, as such, this cannot be recommended in burn patients [17]. This is supported by previous reports showing that volumetric monitoring may lead to even higher resuscitation volumes and possible adverse effects [18].…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…The total circulating blood volume could be an ideal guide to resuscitation [39]. However, a previous study found goal-directed therapy by invasive monitoring, as compared to Baxter's empiric resuscitation formula, caused a significant increase in the volume of fluid administration but did not improve preload or cardiac output parameters [18]. Thus, managing the appropriate volumes of resuscitation fluid is challenging.…”
Section: Discussion Incidence Of Iah/acsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, early goal-directed therapy has led to more aggressive fluid resuscitation [27,28], as shown in a study conducted in 2004 where the goal-directed therapy led to significantly increased fluid volumes in comparison to the Parkland formula [29]. Permissive hypovolemia has been studied afterwards and seems to have benefits regarding outcomes, without the associated adverse effects [30,31].…”
Section: Fluid Creepmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Following published results from studies investigating haemodynamic orientated burn shock resuscitation monitoring techniques [14,23,24] and repeated local clinical audits a protocol of permissive hypovolaemic resuscitation was developed at SWCBC. We believe that children with partial thickness scalds of between 10-20% BSA, resuscitated at a lower rate of fluid administration than the Parkland formula suggests (table 1), especially if managed with biosynthetic dressings, may be less likely to develop complications attributable to over-resuscitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%