2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A classification-based assessment of the optimal spectral and spatial resolutions for Great Lakes coastal wetland imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remote sensing methods for determining macrophyte cover in littoral zones of lakes are effective tools for high-resolution mapping of large areas in space and time, and thus useful for monitoring and ecological assessment (Becker et al, 2005(Becker et al, , 2007Schmieder et al, 2010). Although most applications in lake littoral zones are based on airborne hyper-spectral scanner data (Woithon & Schmieder 2004;Becker et al, 2005Becker et al, , 2007Schmieder et al, 2010), less cost and effort are required to test commercially available, operational satellite data with lower spectral resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remote sensing methods for determining macrophyte cover in littoral zones of lakes are effective tools for high-resolution mapping of large areas in space and time, and thus useful for monitoring and ecological assessment (Becker et al, 2005(Becker et al, , 2007Schmieder et al, 2010). Although most applications in lake littoral zones are based on airborne hyper-spectral scanner data (Woithon & Schmieder 2004;Becker et al, 2005Becker et al, , 2007Schmieder et al, 2010), less cost and effort are required to test commercially available, operational satellite data with lower spectral resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Govender et al (2007) reviewed applications of hyper-and multi-spectral remote sensing in vegetation and water resources studies. Becker et al (2005Becker et al ( , 2007 derived optimal band combinations from hyper-spectral scanner data and optimal spatial resolutions for wetland vegetation classification. They recommended an optimal spatial resolution of 2 m and a minimum of 7 m, with strategically located bands in the VIS-NIR wavelength region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both types of distance measurements had been proved to be with high efficiency in reflecting the spectral discrepancy (South et al, 2004;Goovaerts et al, 2005;Becker et al, 2007). The Mah distance can be written as:…”
Section: Spectral Matching Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of multispectral image analysis with only few wave lengths, good classification results can be achieved by Maximum Likelihood [77,78]. In contrast, Spectral Angle Mapper obtained good classifications with highly complex hyperspectral images [79,80].…”
Section: Detection Accuracy and Time Frame Of The Application Of Exismentioning
confidence: 99%