2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A classification approach based on the outranking model for multiple criteria ABC analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the enterprise survey, we found that there are many types of fragile parts in household appliances that must be managed using different methods. The ABC analysis method is an important and easy way to classify inventory items and has been improved in many ways (Roda et al., ; Liu et al., ; Li et al., ). In this paper, we focus on the shortage portion; therefore, we use the demand information and unit value but not the total value to perform the classification.…”
Section: Numerical Examples and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the enterprise survey, we found that there are many types of fragile parts in household appliances that must be managed using different methods. The ABC analysis method is an important and easy way to classify inventory items and has been improved in many ways (Roda et al., ; Liu et al., ; Li et al., ). In this paper, we focus on the shortage portion; therefore, we use the demand information and unit value but not the total value to perform the classification.…”
Section: Numerical Examples and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other criteria have only been reported in a few (mostly one or two) studies related to the multiple criteria inventory classification problem, i.e. ordering cost [66][67], substitutability [19] [47], replaceability [19] [47], perishability [8], storage cost [8], current item status [26], severity of the impact of its running out [26], number of hits [53], average value per hit [53], payment terms [19], durability [54][55] [73], limitations of warehouse space [49], last use date [54][55], supplier [54], and turnover rate [60]. We note that some proposed models offer more flexibility about the criteria to be included.…”
Section: Classification Criteria and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other approaches apply mixed approaches, e.g. AHP and the k-means algorithm [61], FAHP and ANN [55], FAHP and DEA [49], CA and SAA [60]. Concerning the nature of the output shown in Table 1, most of the approaches generate a grouping of the spare parts intothreeclasses: C,B andA.Unfortunately,thegeneratedoutputsin thesecasescannot beusedto classifynew/unseen items.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Al-Obeidat et al [1] proposed an hybrid model which combine Differential Evolution method with the PROAFTN method, by using the evolutionary algorithm to inductively obtain PROAFTN's parameters from data to achieve a high classification accuracy. Liu et al [21] combined the methods of Electre III and the simulating annealing to deal with the compensatory effect of the items against criteria and opted for grouping criteria. A new MCDM method of Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (called EDAS) [19] is introduced by calculating the best alternative according to the distance from positive and negative solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%