2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case study of the pore water pressure fluctuation on the slip surface using horizontal borehole works on drainage well

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The water induces movements for two main reasons: (i) infiltration increases water pore pressure on the slip surface and remarkably decreasing shear strengths of the landslide mass (Tsao et al, 2005); (ii) water creates an increase of weight on the slope and destabilizes the mass by loading (Brunsden, 1999). However, during the movement, the slip surface evolution creates a new distribution of fluid pressure that can modify the movement (Cornet et al, 2003) linked with a hydromechanical effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The water induces movements for two main reasons: (i) infiltration increases water pore pressure on the slip surface and remarkably decreasing shear strengths of the landslide mass (Tsao et al, 2005); (ii) water creates an increase of weight on the slope and destabilizes the mass by loading (Brunsden, 1999). However, during the movement, the slip surface evolution creates a new distribution of fluid pressure that can modify the movement (Cornet et al, 2003) linked with a hydromechanical effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the period between 1994 and 1998, the landslide enlarged, partially retrogressively into the hinterland, and it especially advanced on the slope. Surficial drainage of the landslide by earthen ditches and prefabricated concrete "canalettes", carried out and maintained in this period, was unsuccessful and did not help to stabilise or at least slow down its advancement (Vlaj andŽigman, 2001). Consequently, the landslide destroyed the state road (called Panoramska cesta) Solčava (642 m) -Sleme (1308 m) at the altitude of ca 1110 m, and a new pontoon steel bridge had to be built instead.…”
Section: The Evolution Of the Macesnik Landslidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This important aspect should not be overlooked in order to ensure the longevity of the mitigation works. Nevertheless, drainage wells have been widely used as a landslide control work, quite often in combination with horizontal drain borings in order to drain groundwater even more effectively (Nakamura, 1988;Wichter et al, 1988;Beer et al, 1992;Peila et al, 1992;Tsao et al, 2005;Shou and Chen, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compressive effective normal stresses (σ n '-P f ) press the opposing discontinuity walls together and resist sliding motion along the discontinuity surface, which can be induced by shear stresses (τ) acting parallel to the discontinuity plane. A reduction in the effective normal stress state leads to the normal opening of discontinuities, inducing a reduction of the internal shear strength of discontinuities or of the failure surface [37]. Deep in the slope and at the slope toe, where principal stresses are all compressive, an interstitial pressure increase can then induce slip on favourably oriented discontinuities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%