“…Evidence in favour of the hypothetical toxic effect of mesalazine found in the reviewed papers included: 1) continuation of mesalazine administration, even in a reduced dose or even if GCs were added, caused worsening of clinical condition, hypoxaemia, opacities on chest X-ray and pulmonary function tests in some patients [14,20,22,25,30,32]; 2) lymphocytes stimulation test or basophile degranulation test for mesalazine yielded positive results in some patients [13,19,28]; 3) clinical and radiologic symptoms resolution was observed, usually within days or weeks from mesalazine discontinuation [13-15, 17-19, 27]; 4) reintroduction of mesalazine caused recurrence of symptoms within 2 days to 2 weeks in some patients [20,21,27]; and 5) in some patients with a history of previous toxicity of sulphasalazine, mesalazine caused the same effects [16]. In contrast, however, the following arguments question the contribution of mesalazine to the development of lung pathology: 1) successful reinstitution of mesalazine after an episode of its supposed lung toxicity in some patients [17,33]; 2) complete resolution of pulmonary problems without mesalazine cessation or any other action in some patients [29,34], even in patients with positive mesalazine lymphocyte stimulation tests [28]; and 3) occurrence of clinically, radiologically and histopathologically identical pulmonary disease in IBD patients not exposed to 5-aminosalicylic acid derivatives [24,29,34,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. Blood eosinophilia is considered to be a factor suggestive of drug-induced reaction.…”