2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpp.2017.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case of benign osteogenic tumour in Homo naledi : Evidence for peripheral osteoma in the U.W. 101-1142 mandible

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although most clinical sources include osteoma in their overviews of osteogenic, benign tumours (El‐Mofty, 2009; Greenspan et al, 2007; Hogendoorn & de Andrea, 2019; Wei & Stevens, 2014), there has been some debate whether this lesion can be considered a true neoplasm, and no definite conclusion has been reached either clinically or palaeopathologically (Gundewar et al, 2013; Odes et al, 2018). Kaplan, Calderon, and Buchner (1994) argued against mandibular osteoma as neoplastic because the lesion's growth potential and growth rate are limited, recurrence after surgical excision is rare and there have been no clinical reports of malignant transformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although most clinical sources include osteoma in their overviews of osteogenic, benign tumours (El‐Mofty, 2009; Greenspan et al, 2007; Hogendoorn & de Andrea, 2019; Wei & Stevens, 2014), there has been some debate whether this lesion can be considered a true neoplasm, and no definite conclusion has been reached either clinically or palaeopathologically (Gundewar et al, 2013; Odes et al, 2018). Kaplan, Calderon, and Buchner (1994) argued against mandibular osteoma as neoplastic because the lesion's growth potential and growth rate are limited, recurrence after surgical excision is rare and there have been no clinical reports of malignant transformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the rational of Kaplan et al, (1994) can also be applied to cranial osteomata, Eshed et al (2002) suggested that, based on their histological features, these lesions be reclassified as hamartoma, a malformation that resembles a neoplasm but results from faulty development. In palaeopathological case reports of osteomata, these lesions are referred to as tumours, and the debate regarding their status as a neoplasm is either not mentioned or not discussed (Blau, 2006; Castro et al, 2019; Dąbrowski et al, 2015; Galassi et al, 2020; Giuffra et al, 2019; Licata, Borgo, Armocida, Nicosia, & Ferioli, 2016; Piombino‐Mascali, Zink, & Panzer, 2017; Premužić & Šikanjic, 2013; Odes et al, 2018; Smith, 2010; Zias, 2006). Bartelink and Wright (2011) seem to be the only researchers who did note this debate in their report of a mandibular tumour from Guatemala, dated to the 6 th to 9 th century CE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Any ante‐mortem bone voids present in a maxilla or mandible associated with a tooth root apex were recorded. Systemic diseases such as multiple myeloma and metastatic carcinoma were not recorded but have been described in the literature (e.g., Odes et al, ). A tooth had to have all the surrounding bone present to be included (Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any antemortem bone voids present in a maxilla or mandible associated with a tooth root apex were recorded. If a lesion was not associated with an apex it is not included here, since a systemic disease such as multiple myeloma and metastatic carcinoma can be responsible (Ogden, 2008;Odes et al, 2018). A tooth had to have all the surrounding bone present to be included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%