A Body Worth Defending 2009
DOI: 10.1215/9780822391111-003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Body Worth Having, or A System of Natural Governance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…xi Such a view is apparent in the unidimensional accounts of some Anglophone social work and mental health perspectives e.g. see http://fosteringandadoption.rip.org.uk/topics/attachment-theoryresearch/ and https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/blog/why-relationships-are-so-important-children-and-youngpeople xii And see Cohen (2008) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…xi Such a view is apparent in the unidimensional accounts of some Anglophone social work and mental health perspectives e.g. see http://fosteringandadoption.rip.org.uk/topics/attachment-theoryresearch/ and https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/blog/why-relationships-are-so-important-children-and-youngpeople xii And see Cohen (2008) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(21 Grams, 2003) Stating the biomedical approach to transplantation, the transplant surgeon affirms embodiment as ownership. The fact that the heart resides inside Paul -and maintains his life -is sufficient for it to belong to him, to be a part of him and thus to be literally his property (Cohen, 2008). Reaffirming a Cartesian model of transplantation, the surgeon presents to the viewer the dominant biomedical view that the mind and the body are separate, that organs are inalienable objects, and that the history of organ donation (how organs travel) is irrelevant to the present embodiment (of an imagined restoration of a healthy body; Fox and Swazey, 1992: 35-38).…”
Section: Biopolitical Temporalities and Bioethical Demandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 In depriving the host of its own proper and essential material, the parasitic microbe thus "naturally" violates liberalism's most sacred precept (i.e., that one owns one's body as one's property). 34 Disregarding the body's propriety by purloining its essential property -like the bad guest that violates its host, as we will consider below -the germ materially perturbs the quasi-natural basis for liberal personhood (i.e., "the body" defines a "natural" metonym for the person 35 ). Hence, insofar as it comes to represent the "virulent agent" of epidemic-causing infectious diseases, which themselves necessarily enfold the biological within the political, the "microscopic parasite" not only biologically but also politically threatens the organism's "economy."…”
Section: Particularity; or How Viruses Come To Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%