2018
DOI: 10.1017/njg.2018.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bioclast-based astronomical timescale for the Maastrichtian in the type area (southeast Netherlands, northeast Belgium) and stratigraphic implications: the legacy of P.J. Felder

Abstract: The present paper, dedicated to the legacy of local geologist–engineer Peter Jozef (Sjeuf) Felder, who died in 2009, confirms his view that bioclasts constitute a valuable tool in the correlation of outcrops and borehole cores across the type area of the Maastrichtian Stage in the vicinity of Maastricht. His approach of interpreting changes in bioclast contents as having been influenced by Milankovitch cyclicity has here been applied successfully to the entire sedimentary complex of Maastrichtian (latest Creta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This setting has been interpreted as middle sublittoral, under subtropical conditions and with sea grass communities (Liebau 1978;). On evidence of index forms amongst coleoid cephalopods (Christensen et al 2005; and inoceramid bivalves (Jagt & Jagt-Yazykova 2018), the lower portion of the Maastricht Formation has been shown to be of late, though not latest, Maastrichtian age, thus corroborating age assignments on the basis of dinoflagellates and calcareous nannoplankton (see Schiøler et al 1997;Keutgen 2018). All these biota allow correlation of these shallow-water biocalcarenites along the fringes of Palaeozoic massifs ( Fig.…”
Section: Stratigraphical Settingmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This setting has been interpreted as middle sublittoral, under subtropical conditions and with sea grass communities (Liebau 1978;). On evidence of index forms amongst coleoid cephalopods (Christensen et al 2005; and inoceramid bivalves (Jagt & Jagt-Yazykova 2018), the lower portion of the Maastricht Formation has been shown to be of late, though not latest, Maastrichtian age, thus corroborating age assignments on the basis of dinoflagellates and calcareous nannoplankton (see Schiøler et al 1997;Keutgen 2018). All these biota allow correlation of these shallow-water biocalcarenites along the fringes of Palaeozoic massifs ( Fig.…”
Section: Stratigraphical Settingmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Stratigraphical distribution of gastropod taxa across the K/Pg boundary in the Maastrichtian type area; age estimates are based on Herngreen et al . () and Keutgen (). Taxa indicated in bold with grey shadow each represent >2% in relative abundance of the latest Maastrichtian gastropod assemblage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Gras & Geluk ; Vonhof et al . ; Keutgen ). Indeed, the chemo‐ and biostratigraphy of the upper Maastricht Formation suggest that the uppermost Maastrichtian is still relatively complete, with unit IVf‐6 representing the last tens of thousands of years of the Cretaceous Period (Smit & Brinkhuis ; Vonhof & Smit ; Keutgen ).…”
Section: Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the most recent cyclostratigraphical and chronostratigraphical age models for the type Maastrichtian (Keutgen, 2018), the base of the Valkenburg Member (Lichtenberg Horizon) can be dated as 66.8 Ma, and the base of the overlying Gronsveld Member as 66.7 Ma. The Lichtenberg Horizon represents the early stages of a transgression from a relative lowstand during a phase of tectonic inversion, whereas the overlying Gronsveld Member represents a relative highstand during tectonic re-laxation, with the maximum flooding surface situated around the middle of this unit.…”
Section: Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, associated skeletal elements of mosasaurid squamates are rare, but isolated teeth, tooth crowns and elements of post-cranial skeletons have proved to be fairly common at some levels within the Gulpen and Maastricht formations in the type area of the Maastrichtian Stage (Fig. 1), of latest age (see Keutgen, 2018). The same holds true for chelonioid turtles, the commonest representative in the area being Allopleuron hofmanni (Gray, 1831).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%