2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-021-02290-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A benchmark for RNA-seq deconvolution analysis under dynamic testing environments

Abstract: Background Deconvolution analyses have been widely used to track compositional alterations of cell types in gene expression data. Although a large number of novel methods have been developed, due to a lack of understanding of the effects of modeling assumptions and tuning parameters, it is challenging for researchers to select an optimal deconvolution method suitable for the targeted biological conditions. Results To systematically reveal the pitfa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(147 reference statements)
2
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected MuSiC 15 for cell type deconvolution based on recommendations from comprehensive benchmarking studies 17 , 18 . Accordingly, MuSiC does not require a priori defined gene lists as input and is one of the preferred methods for cell type deconvolution if suitable reference scRNA-Seq datasets are available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected MuSiC 15 for cell type deconvolution based on recommendations from comprehensive benchmarking studies 17 , 18 . Accordingly, MuSiC does not require a priori defined gene lists as input and is one of the preferred methods for cell type deconvolution if suitable reference scRNA-Seq datasets are available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, low abundant cell types from the reference dataset might not provide reliable information to predict those cell types in the test dataset, especially if a cell type is missing from the reference, which might be solved with most recent methods such as MARS ( 106 ). These and several other challenges are being thoroughly investigated in recent cell deconvolution benchmarking papers ( 22 , 108 ). A similar line of development (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One alternative approach to scRNA-seq is to extrapolate cellular components of the sample from bulk RNA-seq using deconvolution methods. There are more than 50 deconvolution methods published to date, that can be broadly categorized as marker-based (uses marker gene list for deconvolution), reference-based (for the deconvolution process, it uses cell type specific gene expression profiles and list of differentially expressed genes across the cell types in the reference), and reference-free (uses reference profiles for cluster annotation after the deconvolution step) [ 184 – 187 ].…”
Section: Transcriptomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%