2008
DOI: 10.1111/comt.2008.18.issue-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study supports previous research that focuses on communication and conversational activity as the essence of collaboration and the key site for understanding collaborative processes and operation (Hardy et al, 2005;Heath & Frey, 2004;Keyton et al, 2008) but also builds on this research in important ways. First, Hardy et al (2005) called for empirical research to "examine the impacts and dynamics of particular discourses within which a collaboration is enacted" (p. 72).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present study supports previous research that focuses on communication and conversational activity as the essence of collaboration and the key site for understanding collaborative processes and operation (Hardy et al, 2005;Heath & Frey, 2004;Keyton et al, 2008) but also builds on this research in important ways. First, Hardy et al (2005) called for empirical research to "examine the impacts and dynamics of particular discourses within which a collaboration is enacted" (p. 72).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…They also advocate a constitutive view of communication as the sine qua non of collaboration, though it is unclear how communication fulfills this constitutive role when communication process are seen as distinct from the inputs, outputs, and external environment that an input-process-output model suggests. Keyton, Ford, and Smith (2008) offered one of the most developed models of interorganizational collaboration from a distinct communication perspective. They critiqued previous collaboration literature as overly focused on structural explanations, which simplify communicative processes and treat communication as given (vs. emergent), do not adequately account for human interaction at the individual and group levels, and generally are not sufficient to explain the actual work of collaboration.…”
Section: Communication and Civil Society Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This educational use of fotonovelas fits in with a longstanding tradition of entertainment education and narrativebased strategies (e.g., Singhal, Njogu, Bouman, & Elias, 2006;Singhal & Rogers, 1988). Narrative-based health communication may facilitate processing, may increase motivation to accept the main message and act on it because of reduced resistance, can be viewed as a form of learning through experience, and can contribute to changes in attitudes, intentions, and behavior (Fransen, Smit, & Verlegh, 2015;Glaser, Garsoffky, & Schwan, 2009;Hinyard & Kreuter, 2007;Mar & Oatley, 2008;Moyer-Gusé, 2008;Schank & Abelson, 1977, 1995Zabrucky & Moore, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Unification of these frameworks into a central theory for narrative research is an ongoing programmatic aim (Moyer-Gusé, 2008) and one that will likely see key constructs from several programs identified as consistently meaningful mediators. The current research explores four mediators (transportation, identification, believability, and perceived benefits) culled from three theoretical frameworks.…”
Section: Narrative Mediators: Transportation Identification Believamentioning
confidence: 99%