2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1015266425630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Manual time checks were performed for images in most observing sequences, and no discrepancies were noticed 1 . We have previously found a good agreement between the timestamps on the Danish and MPG 2.2m telescopes (Southworth et al 2015), supporting the reliability of both. Southworth et al (2009b) used an early version of DEFOT so the 2008 data were re-reduced with the current version.…”
Section: Data Reductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Manual time checks were performed for images in most observing sequences, and no discrepancies were noticed 1 . We have previously found a good agreement between the timestamps on the Danish and MPG 2.2m telescopes (Southworth et al 2015), supporting the reliability of both. Southworth et al (2009b) used an early version of DEFOT so the 2008 data were re-reduced with the current version.…”
Section: Data Reductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Following the general approach, which we also adopted in our previous studies (e.g. Mancini et al 2014;Southworth et al 2015;Tregloan-Reed et al 2018), we made a new fit of the light curves to estimate the ratio of the radii, k, but fixing the other photometric parameters to their best values (Tables 3 and 4). The uncertainties of k were estimated by performing 20 000 Monte Carlo simulations.…”
Section: Variation Of the Planetary Radius With Wavelengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some of these planets, theoretical calculations have been done using the Roche model by Budaj (2011) and correct the derived spherical radii and densities for the expected planet deformation (e.g. Southworth et al 2015;Delrez et al 2016). Correia (2014) formulated an analytical model for computing the shape of a deformed planet based on the fluid second Love number and also showed the difference between light curves of deformed and spherical planets.…”
Section: Lsstc Data Science Fellowmentioning
confidence: 99%