2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1005583820758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
14
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
14
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to studies with adults (e.g., Woody & Rodriguez, 2000), FAQ subscales were not independent but significantly correlated. However, externally focused attention did not contribute to the mediation model.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to studies with adults (e.g., Woody & Rodriguez, 2000), FAQ subscales were not independent but significantly correlated. However, externally focused attention did not contribute to the mediation model.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Unexpectedly, we found that SAD children also report a higher externally focused attention than NA children. In contrast to studies with adults (e.g., Woody & Rodriguez, 2000), FAQ subscales were not independent but significantly correlated. However, externally focused attention did not contribute to the mediation model.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it was found that, immediately after manipulation of attentional focus, children in the internal focus condition (IFC) reported more anticipatory anxiety before the task. This is in line with results from Woody and Rodriguez (2000) who also found that adults with and without SAD anticipated more anxiety in a self-focusing speech condition than in an external focusing condition. In contrast to previous findings documenting a relationship between selffocused attention and negative affect (Gendolla, Abele, Andrei, Spurk, & Richter, 2005;Mor et al, 2010;Mor & Winquist, 2002), the effect of self-focused attention on mood was not anxiety during task significant in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Children were instructed to indicate on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all to 5 = the whole time) to what extent they attended to certain aspects of the situation during renarration (e.g., "I was focusing on what I would say or do next" or "I was focusing on the other person's appearance or dress"). In studies with adults, the FAQ demonstrated sensitivity to self-focus manipulation (Kashdan & Roberts, 2004;Woody & Rodriguez, 2000). The FAQ has not yet been validated for use with children, but there is at least some evidence for acceptable internal consistency Hodson et al, 2008).…”
Section: Focus Of Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation