2001
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0690(200101)2001:2<293::aid-ejoc293>3.3.co;2-e
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Untitled

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5
3
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0
0

Year Published

Range
2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 10 publications

(15 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

0
15
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our compounds differ from these molecules in having additional dimethylamine substituents at the terminal phenyl rings and, in case of Ref. [ ], in having methoxy groups in the central phenyl ring instead of hexyl groups; such structural modifications, be them applied separately or in combination, lead to an overall red‐shift in absorption and emission of our compounds compared to a 2PV precursor . Moreover, the difference in the optical properties caused by a CN‐attachment in α‐ or β‐position has been found to correlate with the distorsion of the central phenylene ring against the CN‐vinylene planes that is much more peripheral phenyl rings than those in α‐dscn and β‐dscn homologues .…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…With θ 1 (S 1 ) = 1.6°, β‐dscn adopts a significantly more planar conformation (Table ), albeit perfect planarity is precluded due to a torsion θ 2 = 4.5° of the CN‐vinylene plane with respect to the outer phenyl ring. The pronounced twist in the S 0 geometry promotes torsional‐induced nonradiative deactivation channels which, in the case of α‐dscn, cannot be avoided by emission from a planar, quinoidal mesomeric structure in S 1 and, thus, gives rise to a very small fluorescence quantum yield . The Stokes shift, taken as the energy difference between the absorption and emission spectrum, is with 0.56 eV (in toluene) notably larger for α‐dscn than for β‐dscn (0.37 eV in toluene) for any given solvent (Table ); this is an indication that the intramolecular relaxation energy is larger in α‐dscn than for β‐dscn.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, the absorption and the emission spectra of its counterpart α‐dscn are not visibly structured (Figure ). Thus, the structural reorganization on going from the first excited to the ground state is strongly influenced by the CN position: While a structured spectrum indicates backbone planarization in going from S 0 to S 1 for the case of β‐dscn, such a planarization is expected to be sterically hindered in α‐dscn …”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations