2006
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6150-1-27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Background: DNA microarrays are a powerful technology that can provide a wealth of gene expression data for disease studies, drug development, and a wide scope of other investigations. Because of the large volume and inherent variability of DNA microarray data, many new statistical methods have been developed for evaluating the significance of the observed differences in gene expression. However, until now little attention has been given to the characterization of dispersion of DNA microarray data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent BLASTP analysis ( Camacho et al, 2009 ) of predicted proteins indicated that only one circular contig had viral hallmark genes, meanwhile nine contigs had genes associated with bacterial mobile genetic elements and one contig remain completely unknown. These hallmark genes are shared by many viruses but are absents from cellular genomes ( Koonin et al, 2006 ). VirSorter tool analysis ( Roux et al, 2015a ) confirmed these results, obtaining the same complete putative viral contig from the 58°C assembly, 40,740 bp long and 43.9% of GC content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent BLASTP analysis ( Camacho et al, 2009 ) of predicted proteins indicated that only one circular contig had viral hallmark genes, meanwhile nine contigs had genes associated with bacterial mobile genetic elements and one contig remain completely unknown. These hallmark genes are shared by many viruses but are absents from cellular genomes ( Koonin et al, 2006 ). VirSorter tool analysis ( Roux et al, 2015a ) confirmed these results, obtaining the same complete putative viral contig from the 58°C assembly, 40,740 bp long and 43.9% of GC content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MeDIP was selected among many other methods for methylation profiling because it is one of the few methods that is feasible for studying genome-wide methylation differences between groups of subjects, it has been successfully applied in many published studies (Feber et al; Weber et al, 2005; Keshet et al, 2006; Novak et al, 2006; Zhang, 2006; Cheng et al, 2008; Down et al, 2008; Tomazou et al, 2008; Liu et al, 2009; Murphy et al, 2009; Takeshima et al, 2009; Bell et al, 2010; Cheung et al, 2010; Flanagan et al, 2010; Guerrero-Bosagna et al, 2010; Gunther and Grundhoff, 2010; Hiura et al, 2010; Movassagh et al, 2010; Tsui et al, 2010; Lempiainen et al, 2011; Morris et al, 2011), and it has been found competitive with the other high-throughput profiling methods that are in use (Irizarry et al, 2008; Jia et al, 2010; Jin et al, 2010; Robinson et al, 2010; Nair et al, 2011; Rajendram et al, 2011; Yang et al, 2011). Moreover, MeDIP detects DNA methylation exclusively from hydroxymethylation and is not confounded by chemical conversion and biased amplification of converted sequences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most datasets, a t -distribution with degrees of freedom between 3 and 5 got the highest posterior probability. This indicates the need of robust noise models, which can handle outlying data points well and suggests that Gaussian noise models are unsuitable for microarray data analysis, even if according to Novak et al (2006 ) only about 5–15% of samples are non-Gaussian distributed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar methods let Hardin and Wilson (2009 ) conclude that microarray data require heavy-tailed noise models. The conclusion of Novak et al (2006 ) was that 5–15% of genes are non-Gaussian distributed, with the majority following Gaussian distributions. Finding such diverse conclusions about noise in microarray data suggest an in-depth investigation of this issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%