“…MeDIP was selected among many other methods for methylation profiling because it is one of the few methods that is feasible for studying genome-wide methylation differences between groups of subjects, it has been successfully applied in many published studies (Feber et al; Weber et al, 2005; Keshet et al, 2006; Novak et al, 2006; Zhang, 2006; Cheng et al, 2008; Down et al, 2008; Tomazou et al, 2008; Liu et al, 2009; Murphy et al, 2009; Takeshima et al, 2009; Bell et al, 2010; Cheung et al, 2010; Flanagan et al, 2010; Guerrero-Bosagna et al, 2010; Gunther and Grundhoff, 2010; Hiura et al, 2010; Movassagh et al, 2010; Tsui et al, 2010; Lempiainen et al, 2011; Morris et al, 2011), and it has been found competitive with the other high-throughput profiling methods that are in use (Irizarry et al, 2008; Jia et al, 2010; Jin et al, 2010; Robinson et al, 2010; Nair et al, 2011; Rajendram et al, 2011; Yang et al, 2011). Moreover, MeDIP detects DNA methylation exclusively from hydroxymethylation and is not confounded by chemical conversion and biased amplification of converted sequences.…”