2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00774-014-0588-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

7 Tesla MRI of bone microarchitecture discriminates between women without and with fragility fractures who do not differ by bone mineral density

Abstract: Osteoporosis is a disease of poor bone quality. Bone mineral density (BMD) has limited ability to discriminate between subjects without and with poor bone quality, and assessment of bone microarchitecture may have added value in this regard. Our goals were to use 7 T MRI to: (1) quantify and compare distal femur bone microarchitecture in women without and with poor bone quality (defined clinically by presence of fragility fractures); and (2) determine whether microarchitectural parameters could be used to disc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
46
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Chang et al. ). These effects of PTH on bone formation and bone structure and architecture are consistent with those reported under other hindlimb unloading conditions (Ma et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…; Chang et al. ). These effects of PTH on bone formation and bone structure and architecture are consistent with those reported under other hindlimb unloading conditions (Ma et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, this assessment was limited to the proximal femur and distal tibia, which are not common fracture sites. However, there is some evidence the MRI‐derived bone microarchitectural parameters at these sites differs between women with fragility fractures and controls . Fourth, detailed information was not recorded on the number of training sessions supervised by the exercise trainers nor the exercise progressions during the final 6‐month transition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the clinical importance of tissue to fracture resistance is apparent from the literature on predictors of fracture risk as well as genetic diseases affecting bone matrix (e.g., osteogenesis imperfecta) or mineralization (e.g., hypophosphatasia). As determined by high-resolution, peripheral quantitative computed-tomography (HR-pQCT) or micro-magnetic resonance imaging (μMRI), measurements of cortical thickness, cross-sectional area, volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), porosity, and trabecular bone volume fraction acquired at distal sites significantly differ between individuals with osteoporotic fractures and those without fractures [35]. However, there is overlap in all structural and architectural measurements of bone between these two groups such that there is no one bone property – including the gold-standard areal bone mineral density (aBMD) [6] – that unequivocally predicts fracture risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%