6LoWPAN framework for efficient integration of embedded devices to the Internet of Things

Kamio, Masato; Yashiro, Takeshi; Satoh, Ken

doi:10.1109/gcce.2014.7031304

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…HTTP is not as much useful in WSNs as in traditional networks but alternatives like CoAP [20] have emerged for WSNs. We observe that the advent of IoT paradigm has prompted many efforts to provide standard protocol support for WSNs [21].…”

Section: A Differences Between Wsn and Traditional Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Getting Virtualized Wireless Sensor Networks' IaaS Ready for PaaS

Khan

Errounda

Yangui

et al. 2015

2015 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-With the recent advances in sensor hardware and software, architectures for virtualized Wireless Sensor Networks (vWSNs) are now emerging. Through node-and network-level virtualization, vWSNs can be offered as Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) which can aid in realizing the true potential of InternetofThings (IoT). Cloud computing offers elastic provisioning of largescale infrastructures to multiple concurrent users where Platform-asa-Service (PaaS) interacts with IaaS in order to efficiently host and execute applications over these infrastructures. Amalgamating IoT with cloud computing potentially allows rapid application and service provisioning in an efficient, scalable and robust manner. However, interactions between vWSNs and PaaS are largely an unexplored area. Indeed, existing vWSN IaaS are not yet ready for PaaS. This paper proposes a vWSN IaaS architecture which is ready for interactions with PaaS. The proposed architecture is based on our previous works and is rooted in the fundamental differences between traditional IaaS and vWSN IaaS. We built a prototype using Java Sunspot as the WSN tool kit and made early performance measurements.

show abstract

Section: A Differences Between Wsn and Traditional Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%