2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1015457400897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It means the person is much more influenced by high-risk behavior of injection. This study’s results are proof to the claim that this study is clear and obvious and to the claim of being a meaningful study, we can mention Week’s and colleagues’ study in Hartford, America, 2001 that was in conformity with our study (19). As none of the demographic variables of this study were statistically significant, and based on the agreement of our study with other studies done in a network level like Valente and colleagues in America, 2000 (18), Lovell in France, 2002 (2), Shaw and colleagues in Canada, 2004 (20), Wylie and colleagues in Canada, 2006 (22), Unger and colleagues in America, 2006 (23), Havens and colleagues in America, 2011 (24), Tracy and colleagues in America, 2012 (25), and Shahesmaeili in Iran, 2014 (5), we can get that maybe because of data structure in the level of network, demographic variables like age and gender, have a slight influence on high-risk behavior of injection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It means the person is much more influenced by high-risk behavior of injection. This study’s results are proof to the claim that this study is clear and obvious and to the claim of being a meaningful study, we can mention Week’s and colleagues’ study in Hartford, America, 2001 that was in conformity with our study (19). As none of the demographic variables of this study were statistically significant, and based on the agreement of our study with other studies done in a network level like Valente and colleagues in America, 2000 (18), Lovell in France, 2002 (2), Shaw and colleagues in Canada, 2004 (20), Wylie and colleagues in Canada, 2006 (22), Unger and colleagues in America, 2006 (23), Havens and colleagues in America, 2011 (24), Tracy and colleagues in America, 2012 (25), and Shahesmaeili in Iran, 2014 (5), we can get that maybe because of data structure in the level of network, demographic variables like age and gender, have a slight influence on high-risk behavior of injection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…6.2 illustrates the links between the three primary ethnic groups in a drug users network. In some cases (namely for HBV and HIV), the analysis of network connections has led to develop prevention or control actions by detecting high-risk sites [569][570][571][572][573][574].…”
Section: Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nodes are clustered into the three primary ethnic groups considered in the analysis of Ref. [570]. is possible.…”
Section: Dynamics I: Opinion Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When x * is a non-degenerate configuration (i.e, x * = x 0 , x N ), this indicates that sets of agents in the network are more vulnerable than others to the epidemics. We illustrate this by solving for the most-probable configuration using [20] under different λ µ , γ parameters for 2 realistic networks: a social network [8] and the Western United States power grid [9], obtained from [21] The network shown in Fig. 1 is a 193 node, 273 edge social network of drug users in Hartford, CT.…”
Section: Social Network and The Power Gridmentioning
confidence: 99%