2020
DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2020.1731703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D visualisation, communities and the production of significance

Abstract: In this paper, we discuss how community co-production of heritage records facilitates the production and negotiation of new forms of value and significance. We draw on case studies from the ACCORD project, which used 3D digital technologies for community engagement through co-creation, to explore how a site's significance can be affected and challenged through community recording. Whilst multiple modes of recording operate in this way, digital 3D recording, long held as the sole domain of the technical expert,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using digital tools to engage the local community in protecting and promoting the values of cultural heritage is gaining more and more attention [13,48]. Digital technologies can improve conservation and preservation techniques, enrich archives with interactive media, mapping heritage with Geographic Information System, augment participatory experiences, promoting communication among stakeholders, and deepening the understanding of the cultural attachment [63,64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using digital tools to engage the local community in protecting and promoting the values of cultural heritage is gaining more and more attention [13,48]. Digital technologies can improve conservation and preservation techniques, enrich archives with interactive media, mapping heritage with Geographic Information System, augment participatory experiences, promoting communication among stakeholders, and deepening the understanding of the cultural attachment [63,64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarah Kenderdine writes compellingly of the ways in which a sense of connection to animated objects and sites is achieved in exhibition spaces designed as theatres of synaesthetic experience (Kenderdine 2013;Kenderdine et al 2014;Kenderdine 2018). These sorts of interventions, 'applied to the kinds of heritage associated with high levels of cultural significance in national and international heritage regimes' (Jeffrey et al 2020), are instances of digital technologies being used to produce reconstructions, or put to use in what Katz and Tokovinine (2017) term 'experimental archaeology', testing hypotheses and re-creating imagined, or (rigorously) approximated, past forms and conditions. This is closely linked to the other broad category of use for 3D imaging which is the creation of facsimiles, replicas or reproductions -a practice often stemming from preservation objectives -wherein a high-fidelity surrogate is required to back-up or supersede, and thus ensure the survival of, the original.…”
Section: Uses Of 3d Visualizations In Heritagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further to the official archives and narratives are the unofficial, 'othered' heritages that centre on the rock and surrounding landscape. Recently one aspect of this heritage was explored as part of the ACCORD project (Jeffrey et al 2020). Part of this project engaged with the climbers and climbing heritage at Dumbarton Rock, known as 'Dumby', with the aim of expanding the official heritage narrative and surfacing the additional layers of engagement with the landscape (Hale et al 2017; National Record for the Historic Environment 2014).…”
Section: Landscapes Heritages and Heterotopiasmentioning
confidence: 99%