2012
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2012.736883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D SPH modelling of hydraulic jump in a very large channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shorter domain was chosen to reduce the computational cost without influencing the quality of the numerical solution, as shown by [46] in the case of 2D undular jump simulations. A schematic figure of the problem setup can be seen in Figure 4.…”
Section: Numerical Tests and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The shorter domain was chosen to reduce the computational cost without influencing the quality of the numerical solution, as shown by [46] in the case of 2D undular jump simulations. A schematic figure of the problem setup can be seen in Figure 4.…”
Section: Numerical Tests and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peculiar features of the SPH method used to obtain the present results were described in detail in ( [29,46]): simulations are performed through a Weakly Compressible SPH (WCSPH) approach, in which an artificial compressibility is introduced to solve explicitly in time the equations of motion of an incompressible fluid. As suggested by [58], the reduced value of the speed of sound should result in a numerical Mach number everywhere lower than 0.1 in order to bound the error associated with the adoption of a compressible formulation for the incompressible free-surface water flow to 1%: here, the adopted value of 30 ms −1 guarantees a numerical Mach number everywhere lower than 0.07.…”
Section: Sph Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations