GEOBIA 2016: Solutions and Synergies 2016
DOI: 10.3990/2.418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Semantic labeling of ALS point clouds by exploiting multi-scale, multi-type neighborhoods for feature extraction

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The semantic labeling of 3D point clouds acquired via airborne laser scanning typically relies on the use of geometric features. In this paper, we present a framework considering complementary types of geometric features extracted from multi-scale, multi-type neighborhoods to describe (i) the local 3D structure for neighborhoods of different scale and type and (ii) how the local 3D structure behaves across different scales and across different neighborhood types. The derived features are provided as i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly the classes Low Vegetation, Shrub and Fence / Hedge exhibit a similar geometric behavior and misclassifications among these classes therefore occur quite often. However, this is in accordance with other investigations involving the Vaihingen Dataset (Blomley et al, 2016a;Steinsiek et al, 2017). Furthermore, the classes Powerline and Car reveal lower detection rates, which is also due to the fact that these classes are not covered representatively in the training data, where they are represented by 546 and 4614 examples, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particularly the classes Low Vegetation, Shrub and Fence / Hedge exhibit a similar geometric behavior and misclassifications among these classes therefore occur quite often. However, this is in accordance with other investigations involving the Vaihingen Dataset (Blomley et al, 2016a;Steinsiek et al, 2017). Furthermore, the classes Powerline and Car reveal lower detection rates, which is also due to the fact that these classes are not covered representatively in the training data, where they are represented by 546 and 4614 examples, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, only few approaches have been evaluated on the provided dataset so far Blomley et al, 2016a;Steinsiek et al, 2017), and correctly classifying the dataset turned out to be rather challenging as several classes reveal a quite similar geometric behavior (e.g. the classes Low Vegetation, Fence / Hedge and Shrub), while others combine subgroups of different appearance (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WhuY3 8 deep learning method used a convolutional network operating on four features in a multi-scale fashion. The K LDA (Blomley et al, 2016) method used covariance features at multiple scales. Finally, the LUH 9 method used a two-layer hierarchical CRF that explicitly defines contextual relationships and utilizes voxel cloud connectivity segmentation, along with handcrafted features such as Fast Point Feature Histograms (FPFH).…”
Section: Classification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labeling was achieved by filtering the scene into ground and non-ground points according to Axelsson (2000), then applying a 3D-region-growing segmentation to both sets to generate object proposals. Like Blomley et al (2016), several geometric features were also derived, although specific details were not published. Without incorporating contextual features, each segment/proposal was then classified into a selected set of five classes from the main ISPRS 3D Semantic Labeling Contest.…”
Section: Direct Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, airborne laser scanning (ALS) has become important in acquiring 3D point clouds. ALS point clouds allow an automated analysis of large areas in terms of assigning a (semantic) class label to each point of the considered 3D point clouds (Blomley et al, 2016;Chehata et al, 2009;Mallet et al, 2011;Niemeyer et al, 2014;Shapovalov et al, 2010). However, the relatively low point density, the irregular point distribution and the complexity of observed scenes make the accuracy of the classification result hard to improve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%