2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D object retrieval with stacked local convolutional autoencoder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method was tested on two benchmark datasets demonstrating that the proposed method was more efficient at three-dimensional shape retrieval than other global features based methods. In another similar work [19], a stacked local convolutional autoencoder was used for…”
Section: Recent Relevant Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was tested on two benchmark datasets demonstrating that the proposed method was more efficient at three-dimensional shape retrieval than other global features based methods. In another similar work [19], a stacked local convolutional autoencoder was used for…”
Section: Recent Relevant Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CNN-models are optimized using an error-gradient algorithm [31]. CNNs are widely used in image classification [32] speech-processing tasks [33] and various other applications [34][35][36]. Feature learning through CNNs have several advantages over other deep-architectures.…”
Section: International Journal Of Computer Applications (0975 -8887) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to various characteristics of 3D objects, diverse descriptors are invented to capture different features [3,8,13,14,22,[30][31][32]57]. We can generally divide these feature descriptors into two groups, which are model-based and view-based representations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%