2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(01)00043-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D FE analysis of peening of strain-rate sensitive materials using multiple impingement model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
142
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
8
142
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model in its present state can account for the loading type, but in order to account for the residual stresses and strain hardening, consideration of the material's cyclic stress-strain characteristics must be made. Once this data is available, we intend to use a more appropriate material model, such as a combined isotropic and kinematic hardening approach, which can capture the material evolutionary behaviour to model firstly the shot peening process (several approaches to this are well documented in the literature, one such physical model which would be appropriate for application in the present work is the multiple impingement model first developed by Meguid [44]) and then the fatigue cycling. This approach would be able to capture both variations in material properties resulting from shot peening and also residual stress development which can be verified against the experimental data reported in the present work before application to complex components.…”
Section: Residual Stress Profiles After Grindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model in its present state can account for the loading type, but in order to account for the residual stresses and strain hardening, consideration of the material's cyclic stress-strain characteristics must be made. Once this data is available, we intend to use a more appropriate material model, such as a combined isotropic and kinematic hardening approach, which can capture the material evolutionary behaviour to model firstly the shot peening process (several approaches to this are well documented in the literature, one such physical model which would be appropriate for application in the present work is the multiple impingement model first developed by Meguid [44]) and then the fatigue cycling. This approach would be able to capture both variations in material properties resulting from shot peening and also residual stress development which can be verified against the experimental data reported in the present work before application to complex components.…”
Section: Residual Stress Profiles After Grindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the appearances of powerful finite element software such as ABAQUS, ANSYS and NASTRAN, attention was focused on numerical simulation of shot peening process [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Such a simulation method provides a cheap and easy way to study the dynamic impact of a shot with high velocity, the double non-linearity of the problem due to the contact of two bodies and the elastic-plastic behaviour of the target, etc.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the modelling accuracy, dynamic analysis of single and multiple shot impacts have been conducted by many researchers [33][34][35][36][37][38]. Johnson [33] initially developed a dynamic model of a single shot using a pseudo-dynamic approach.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies carried out by [11][12][13][14][15] indicate that the SP process generates compressive stresses. Research carried out by Benedetti M., Fontanari V. using alloy AA7050-T7451 has shown that the diameter of shot used does not significantly affect the amount of residual stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the case of pressure, the impact of the angle of attack of the processing material on the range of stresses is variable. Research carried out by Jianming W., Feihong L. and Meguid S.A. indicates that cyclical stress of 300 MPa results an over 10-fold increase of the fatigue limit in comparison to other conventional process forming techniques that generate compressive stress [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%