2017 Sensor Signal Processing for Defence Conference (SSPD) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/sspd.2017.8233223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Automatic Target Recognition for UAV Platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The suggested architecture performs well for the following reasons. First, HoD‐S is robust to highly sparse point clouds [21, 22, 25] providing to the adaptive H ∞ filter only well‐established correspondences. Second, the H ∞ filter has been designed for robustness against extreme nuisances, and third, the adaptive measurement noise covariance H k affords further performance improvement over the standard H ∞ recursive filter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The suggested architecture performs well for the following reasons. First, HoD‐S is robust to highly sparse point clouds [21, 22, 25] providing to the adaptive H ∞ filter only well‐established correspondences. Second, the H ∞ filter has been designed for robustness against extreme nuisances, and third, the adaptive measurement noise covariance H k affords further performance improvement over the standard H ∞ recursive filter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We describe all vertices belonging to each point cloud P k and P k +1 using a variant of the histogram of distances (HoD) [20] entitled HoD‐Short (HoD‐S) [21, 22]. Despite current literature offering quite a few 3D local feature descriptors such as the fast point feature histogram [23], rotational projection statistics [17] and signatures of histograms of orientations [24], we used the HoD‐S due to its processing efficiency and robustness to highly sparse point clouds [21, 22, 25] as examined in this work.…”
Section: H∞ Lidar Odometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters of the architecture and of the competing methods are tuned based on the SLA Scenario. Table 2 presents the tuned parameters, while the ones not tuned are fixed either to the ones originally proposed by their authors or for OUR-CVFH and Spin Images to their PCL implementation [34,49,50]. Odometry performance is evaluated based on drift, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatives to pure ICP registration for pose estimation have also been proposed by substituting ICP with a UKF filter, an iterative least-squares (LS) scheme, or with an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) [32], [33]. An additional alternative is suggested in [18] that combines 3D local feature matching based on the Histogram of Distances -Short (HoD-S) descriptor [34] and the H∞ filter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations involve solutions based on numerous spatial, i.e. 2D/ 3D and data domains, such as 2D infrared (IR) [1][2][3][4][5] , 2D Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] , 2D Inverse SAR (ISAR) 22 and 3D Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) [23][24][25][26][27] , with each of these data modalities having its own strengths and weaknesses. For example, state-of-the-art local feature (data) descriptors from the visual domain have already proven their capabilities in the IR domain, but IR suffers from the time of day and the target's history 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%