2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D active surfaces for liver segmentation in multisequence MRI images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For CT, state-of-the-art algorithms typically have shown good performance, with mean Dice scores of 0.93-0.95 (13)(14)(15). For MRI, a wide performance range has been reported, with mean Dice scores ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 depending on the specific MR technique and contrast material used (9,(16)(17)(18)(19)34,35). In this work, we explored the feasibility of a single multimodal CNN to perform this task with comparable accuracy across different imaging modalities and techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For CT, state-of-the-art algorithms typically have shown good performance, with mean Dice scores of 0.93-0.95 (13)(14)(15). For MRI, a wide performance range has been reported, with mean Dice scores ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 depending on the specific MR technique and contrast material used (9,(16)(17)(18)(19)34,35). In this work, we explored the feasibility of a single multimodal CNN to perform this task with comparable accuracy across different imaging modalities and techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While efforts have been made to develop segmentation algorithms for a single modality or for a particular phase of intravenous contrast material enhancement (9,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19), a generalized algorithm that is robust across multiple imaging modalities, techniques, sequences, signal weightings, and phases of contrast enhancement would be beneficial for many clinical applications. For example, a patient might undergo different types of CT and MRI examinations during routine clinical care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual and automated image segmentation from multisequence MR data is a challenging problem because of the presence of different contrasts requiring significant amounts of training data and/or using complementary imaging information within multiple sequences . Sophisticated solutions have been proposed, but each require segmenting individual channels, which considerably increases the computational complexity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multisequence nature of MR imaging presents an ideal framework for developing specialized methods within the emerging area of multi‐image automatic segmentation strategies, in which using multiple images in segmentation models can substantially improve the accuracy and robustness of algorithms . Increasingly, automated MR segmentation algorithms are becoming more accurate and faster, producing localization and shape of the targeted object(s) in several minutes, which required experts/operators substantially longer to complete .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 2D approaches lack information in the third axis. This information when dealing with 3D objects, as it is the case with human tissues and organs, may provide details that will lead to a more precise solution [ 44 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%