2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of early vasopressin use on patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also observed an association between early use of vasopressin and short-term mortality and length of in-hospital stay, which were contrasted with a previous meta-analysis (48) for the inclusion of newly published studies as well as the exclusion of studies in which the patients in the late group did not receive vasopressin. The rationale may lie in the catecholamine sparing effect, because our result show that its early initiation was associated with shorter vasopressor use duration, which may reduce the immune paralysis effect of norepinephrine in the late phase of sepsis progression.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…We also observed an association between early use of vasopressin and short-term mortality and length of in-hospital stay, which were contrasted with a previous meta-analysis (48) for the inclusion of newly published studies as well as the exclusion of studies in which the patients in the late group did not receive vasopressin. The rationale may lie in the catecholamine sparing effect, because our result show that its early initiation was associated with shorter vasopressor use duration, which may reduce the immune paralysis effect of norepinephrine in the late phase of sepsis progression.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The results were very uncertain and discussable. A meta-analysis including the results obtained on 788 patients treated with early administration of vasopressin (6 h septic shock) did not show any advantage with the comparator group, treated with the usual protocol [ 18 ]. A further study was addressed to identify the procedures used in intensive care, when patients with AKI where treated [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also regarding the recommendation to start VP, Huang et al (2021), in a systematic review, demonstrated that the infusion of vasopressin within 6 hours of the onset of septic shock was not associated with a reduction in mortality and length of stay, but seems to reduce the use of renal replacement therapy (Huang et al 2021). In addition, a prospective open-label trial by Hammond et al (2018) found that the VP and NA group as first choice reached the MAP goal (65 mmHg) faster than the group that used only NA (Hammond et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%