2022
DOI: 10.1089/wound.2020.1186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Studies on Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Chronic Cutaneous Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was suggested also in a previous similar meta‐analyses study which showed similar promising outcomes of platelet‐rich plasma in improving the hepatocellular carcinoma and reducing the complete‐healed diabetic foot ulcer wounds. 50 , 51 , 52 Well‐conducted randomised controlled trials are needed to assess these factors and the combination of different ages, ethnicity, and other variants of subjects; since our meta‐analysis study could not answer whether different ages, ethnicity, and gender are associated with the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was suggested also in a previous similar meta‐analyses study which showed similar promising outcomes of platelet‐rich plasma in improving the hepatocellular carcinoma and reducing the complete‐healed diabetic foot ulcer wounds. 50 , 51 , 52 Well‐conducted randomised controlled trials are needed to assess these factors and the combination of different ages, ethnicity, and other variants of subjects; since our meta‐analysis study could not answer whether different ages, ethnicity, and gender are associated with the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study of 24 wounds showed that the size of 17 wounds was reduced by 90%, and 3 wounds was reduced by 80%–90% after PRP treatment ( 9 ). A recent meta-analysis of PRP in chronic refractory wounds, including seventeen randomized controlled trials, showed that compared with the control group, PRP significantly increased the percentage of healed wounds and the percentage of the healed area ( 11 ). All the studies showed the effectiveness of PRP and PRF in the treatment of chronic wounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the studies showed the effectiveness of PRP and PRF in the treatment of chronic wounds. Autologous PRP was much safer than allogeneic PRP, although they were both effective in chronic refractory wounds ( 11 ). In this study, the combined use of autologous PRP injection and PRF filling resulted in a better wound healing rate than the use of PRP and PRF alone reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Platelets play an important role in innate immunity since they degranulate and release antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) when activated [14,15]. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous compound obtained from an individual's blood with numerous applications within the biomedical field [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Originally, PRP was found to be an effective treatment for musculoskeletal conditions such as osteoarthritis [25][26][27] or bone infections [28], among others [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Platelet rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous compound obtained from an individual's blood with numerous applications within the biomedical field [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Originally, PRP was found to be an effective treatment for musculoskeletal conditions such as osteoarthritis [25][26][27] or bone infections [28], among others [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. As one of the main complications of traumatic lesions is potential subsequent bacterial infections [29][30][31], the discovery of the antimicrobial capacities of PRP brought great advantages to its utilization, since the application of a single compound could aid with multiple complications at a time such as pain relief [18], immune regulation [24] and bacterial control [27,[32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%