2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence-based interventions implemented in low-and middle-income countries for sickle cell disease management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: Background Despite ~90% of sickle cell disease (SCD) occurring in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), the vast majority of people are not receiving evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to reduce SCD-related adverse outcomes and mortality, and data on implementation research outcomes (IROs) and SCD is limited. This study aims to synthesize available data on EBIs for SCD and assess IROs. Methods We conducted a systematic review of RCTs reporting on EBIs for SCD management implemented in LMICs. We identifie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Search outputs from research databases suggest that this REA is the first to evaluate the impact of educational interventions relating to improving HCPs' knowledge and attitude towards SCD patients and acute SCD pain management. The results and inferences presented in this review align with two previous systematic reviews (Gyamfi et al, 2021;Häggman-Laitila et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Search outputs from research databases suggest that this REA is the first to evaluate the impact of educational interventions relating to improving HCPs' knowledge and attitude towards SCD patients and acute SCD pain management. The results and inferences presented in this review align with two previous systematic reviews (Gyamfi et al, 2021;Häggman-Laitila et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These ameliorating effects have translated into improved patient outcomes, including reduced rate of vaso-occlusive crisis, blood transfusions, hospitalizations, and incidence of acute chest syndrome, as well as improved organ function and overall survival (S. Charache et al, 1995 ; Youssry et al, 2017 ; Ofakunrin et al, 2020 ). Although hydroxyurea was approved for SCD management in adult patients by the US FDA in 1998 ( Ault, 1998 ), for pediatric patients in 2017, and specifically for children within low and middle income countries (LMICs) in 2018, ( Tshilolo et al, 2019 ) challenges to its routine use in LMICs persist ( Gyamfi et al, 2021a ; Gyamfi et al, 2021b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated that between 60,000 to 100,000 individuals live with SCD in Brazil today [ 3 , 15 ]. In other LMICs the SCD population is also showing improvements in survival, [ 16 ] highlighting the need for better understanding of the costs and resources needed to support continued survival improvements. Clinical guidelines outlining healthcare management of the SCD population specifies early diagnosis, ongoing monitoring, and disease-specific therapies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%