2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ChinaHighPM10 dataset: generation, validation, and spatiotemporal variations from 2015 to 2019 across China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
2
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a slight temporal dependence in that the PM 2.5 bias increases gradually with increasing standard deviation, reaching a maximum around 11:00 LT and subsequently decreasing. This seems to be closely related to the diurnal variation in PM 2.5 concen- 2019c) because machine learning is not sensitive to the systematic bias of aerosol retrievals (Wei et al, 2021c). Nevertheless, our model is generally robust and can accurately estimate PM 2.5 concentrations with small mean (median) biases of 0.05-0.08 (0.63-0.99) µg m −3 during different hours throughout the day.…”
Section: Temporal-scale Performancementioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a slight temporal dependence in that the PM 2.5 bias increases gradually with increasing standard deviation, reaching a maximum around 11:00 LT and subsequently decreasing. This seems to be closely related to the diurnal variation in PM 2.5 concen- 2019c) because machine learning is not sensitive to the systematic bias of aerosol retrievals (Wei et al, 2021c). Nevertheless, our model is generally robust and can accurately estimate PM 2.5 concentrations with small mean (median) biases of 0.05-0.08 (0.63-0.99) µg m −3 during different hours throughout the day.…”
Section: Temporal-scale Performancementioning
confidence: 72%
“…For near-surface concentrations, the networks provide high-quality PM 2.5 measurements every hour (even every few minutes) but with non-uniform coverage. In recent years, an increased effort has been made in estimating PM 2.5 with products generated from multiple instruments on sunsynchronous satellites, e.g., the Multi-angle Imaging Spec-troRadiometer (MISR) (Liu et al, 2005;van Donkelaar et al, 2006), the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) (Liu et al, 2007;Ma et al, 2014;Wei et al, 2019aWei et al, , 2020Wei et al, , 2021a, and the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) (Wei et al, 2021c;Wu et al, 2016;Yao et al, 2019). However, due to their low revisit cycles (one or two overpasses per day), they are unable to monitor the diurnal variation in pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, fine particles (PM 2.5 ) are primary pollutants of substantial public concern in urban cities (Wei et al, 2019;Wei et al, 2021b). Through wet precipitation, rainwater scavenges air pollutants from the air (Niu et al, 2014;Rao et al, 2016;Wei et al, 2020;Wei et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Recent-past Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure was repeated 10 times until all the data had been tested. The training and validation data were totally independent in the sample and spatial scales, which have been widely used to evaluate the overall accuracy and spatial prediction ability of the model [40][41][42]. In addition, four statistical indicators were employed: the regression line (slope and intercept), R 2 , RMSE, In the first stage, to describe the time information more accurately, a time-weighted matrix was established to reflect the temporal difference in PM 2.5 concentrations among different days in a year.…”
Section: Valuation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%