2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-022-05214-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D disposable stochastic sensors for molecular recognition and quantification of maspin in biological samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several 3D stochastic microsensors and 2D disposable sensors have been developed for the purpose of conducting screening tests on biological samples such as tears, whole blood, saliva, urine, and tissue samples. These sensors have demonstrated a high level of reliability in detecting various medical conditions including cancer, 25,26 diabetes, 27,28 influenza, 29 and obesity 30 at an early stage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several 3D stochastic microsensors and 2D disposable sensors have been developed for the purpose of conducting screening tests on biological samples such as tears, whole blood, saliva, urine, and tissue samples. These sensors have demonstrated a high level of reliability in detecting various medical conditions including cancer, 25,26 diabetes, 27,28 influenza, 29 and obesity 30 at an early stage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard solutions of various BTC concentrations were used to calibrate the sensor. The t off value (BTC signature) read in the diagrams served for the qualitative analysis, whereas the t on value was found to be related to the BTC concentration through the calibration equation of the sensor 1 / italict on = italica + italicb × italicC BTC where a is the intercept and b is the slope/sensitivity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure is based on the stochastic method applied to a range of biomarkers used for the early detection of different diseases [21][22][23]. The stochastic method used chronoamperometry for which a constant potential (0.125 V vs Ag/AgCl) was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%