2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D and 3D techniques to assess the structure and porosity of Oxisols and their correlations with other soil properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar areas with coalesced microaggregates associated with areas having a strong microgranular structure with highly to moderately separated microaggregates were earlier described by Gomes et al [2004] on thin sections of Bw horizons of clayey latosols located on the South American and Velhas geomorphic surfaces in the Cerrado Biome. They were again described very recently by Pessoa et al [2022] in latosols presenting different degrees of microgranular structure development as shown on the thin sections studied and the proportion of aggregates 8-16 mm in diameter measured in the Bw horizons.…”
Section: Development Of the Microgranular Structurementioning
confidence: 55%
“…Similar areas with coalesced microaggregates associated with areas having a strong microgranular structure with highly to moderately separated microaggregates were earlier described by Gomes et al [2004] on thin sections of Bw horizons of clayey latosols located on the South American and Velhas geomorphic surfaces in the Cerrado Biome. They were again described very recently by Pessoa et al [2022] in latosols presenting different degrees of microgranular structure development as shown on the thin sections studied and the proportion of aggregates 8-16 mm in diameter measured in the Bw horizons.…”
Section: Development Of the Microgranular Structurementioning
confidence: 55%
“…A recent study revealed that total pore space in Oxisols (Ferralsols counterpart in Soil Taxonomy) increases as the gibbsite/kaolinite ratio increases and the haematite/(haematite+goethite) ratio decreases (Pessoa et al, 2022). Pessoa et al (2022) showed that Rhodic Haplustox (Rhodic Ferralsols) have the highest total pore space among Oxisols equivalent to Xanthic, Geric, and Haplic Ferralsols. Therefore, if the clay mineralogy of Profundihumic Ferralsols were the reason for a greater porosity of PF compared to other Ferralsols, we should observe (i) a higher gibbsite/kaolinite ratio and a lower haematite/(haematite+goethite) than in Rhodic Ferralsols (Pessoa et al, 2022); and (ii) little variation in mineralogical composition among Profundihumic Ferralsols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pessoa et al (2022) showed that Rhodic Haplustox (Rhodic Ferralsols) have the highest total pore space among Oxisols equivalent to Xanthic, Geric, and Haplic Ferralsols. Therefore, if the clay mineralogy of Profundihumic Ferralsols were the reason for a greater porosity of PF compared to other Ferralsols, we should observe (i) a higher gibbsite/kaolinite ratio and a lower haematite/(haematite+goethite) than in Rhodic Ferralsols (Pessoa et al, 2022); and (ii) little variation in mineralogical composition among Profundihumic Ferralsols. However, the clay mineralogy of Profundihumic Ferralsols varies substantially according to the parent material (Marques et al, 2011; Schaefer et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to their high stability, the structural unity is preserved even after events of great fluxes of energy and mass, like heavy rainfall: These so‐called pseudosands have already been described several decades ago (Bui et al., 1989; Neufeldt et al., 1999; Santos et al., 1989; Sharma & Uehara, 1968). Nowadays, pseudosands are often referred to by many other non‐explicit names like “(clay) micro‐/macroaggregates,” “granular (micro‐/macro‐)structure,” “(micro/macro) nodular structures,” “pseudo‐particles,” and others (e.g., Cooper et al., 2005; Neufeldt et al., 1999; Pessoa et al., 2022; Rabbi et al., 2015; Radulovich et al., 1992; Volland‐Tuduri et al., 2005). Confusion is predictable when no unique name and no clear definition are provided, as it is the case for the term “aggregate” (Baveye, 2021; Letey, 1991; Totsche et al., 2018; Vogel et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%