2018
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autologous transplantation versus allogeneic transplantation in patients with follicular lymphoma experiencing early treatment failure

Abstract: Patients with high-risk FL, as defined by ETF, undergoing auto-HCT for FL have low NRM and a promising 5-year OS rate (70%). MSD HCT has lower relapse rates than auto-HCT but similar OS. Cancer 2018;124:2541-51. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A “revival” of interest in autologous SCT has occurred focused on patients with early relapse. Several retrospective analyses have reported 5 year OS of 70% following autologous SCT in this patient population . Data generated from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the National LymphoCare Study, suggests that patients with early treatment failure undergoing early autologous SCT had higher 5‐year OS than those without auto SCT (73% vs 60%) …”
Section: Treatment Of Relapsed Flmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A “revival” of interest in autologous SCT has occurred focused on patients with early relapse. Several retrospective analyses have reported 5 year OS of 70% following autologous SCT in this patient population . Data generated from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the National LymphoCare Study, suggests that patients with early treatment failure undergoing early autologous SCT had higher 5‐year OS than those without auto SCT (73% vs 60%) …”
Section: Treatment Of Relapsed Flmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Those undergoing MSD allogeneic transplantation had lower relapse rates than those undergoing ASCT (73% vs 70%) and similar OS, but increased nonrelapse mortality (5% vs 17%). 38 This may be an option for patients with extensive bone marrow involvement precluding use of ASCT or relapse after ASCT.…”
Section: Is the Patient A Candidate For A Clinical Trial?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 5‐year adjusted probability of NRM was significantly lower for auto‐HCT (5%) vs MSD (17%) or MUD HCT (33%; P < 0.0001). The 5‐year adjusted probability of disease relapse was lower with MSD (31%) or MUD HCT (23%) vs auto‐HCT (58%; P < 0.0001) …”
Section: High‐risk Fl: Can Registry Data Inform Decision Making?mentioning
confidence: 96%