Non-invasive genetic monitoring involving citizen science enables reconstruction of current pack dynamics in a re-establishing wolf population

Abstract

BackgroundCarnivores are re-establishing in many human-populated areas, where their presence is often contentious. Reaching consensus on management decisions is often hampered by a dispute over the size of the local carnivore population. Understanding the reproductive dynamics and individual movements of the carnivores can provide support for management decisions, but individual-level information can be difficult to obtain from elusive, wide-ranging species. Non-invasive genetic sampling can yield such information, but makes subsequent reconstruction of population history challenging due to incomplete population coverage and error-prone data. Here, we combine a collaborative, volunteer-based sampling scheme with Bayesian pedigree reconstruction to describe the pack dynamics of an establishing grey wolf (Canis lupus) population in south-west Finland, where wolf breeding was recorded in 2006 for the first time in over a century.ResultsUsing DNA extracted mainly from faeces collected since 2008, we identified 81 individual wolves and assigned credible full parentages to 70 of these and partial parentages to a further 9, revealing 7 breeding pairs. Individuals used a range of strategies to obtain breeding opportunities, including dispersal to established or new packs, long-distance migration and inheriting breeding roles. Gene flow occurred between all packs but inbreeding events were rare.ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate that characterizing ongoing pack dynamics can provide detailed, locally-relevant insight into the ecology of contentious species such as the wolf. Involving various stakeholders in data collection makes these results more likely to be accepted as unbiased and hence reliable grounds for management decisions.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12898-017-0154-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Expectations and Challenges of Wildlife Disease Research in the Era of Genomics: Forecasting with a Horizon Scan-like Exercise

“…These difficulties can be caused by DNA that is low in quantity, degraded, or that contains inhibitory compounds. DNA isolated from fecal material has been the most promising for wildlife disease research because not only is it non-invasive, but feces can also provide insight into the diet and parasite load (e.g., Schwab et al 2011;Carver et al 2012;Granroth-Wilding et al 2017). Recently, new techniques to enrich for host DNA from feces has greatly improved sequence output and quality, and these types of improvements can facilitate future work from these samples (Perry et al 2010;Hart et al 2015;Mathay et al 2015).…”

Balancing costs and confidence: volunteer-provided point observations, GPS telemetry and the genetic monitoring of Finland’s wolves

“…1). The voluntary scheme was established to opportunistically collect faecal samples (Granroth-Widing et al 2017). In the east-central territories, 10 professionals snow-tracked wolves for 2 months in Jan-Feb 2017 and collected scat and urine samples for the genetic analyses.…”

Environmental observation, social media, and One Health action: A description of the Local Environmental Observer (LEO) Network

“…Alaska encompasses a large geographic area with little infrastructure, making it difficult to monitor potential One Health issues. Citizen Science, defined as a collaboration between scientists and the general public to collect data, has been used in several contexts for environmental monitoring [ [11] , [12] , [13] ]. The citizen Science approach has been found to increase the breadth of scientific evaluation, allowing scientists to reach areas that would otherwise be inaccessible [ 14 , 15 ].…”