2017
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(17)30169-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Red blood cell storage and in-hospital mortality: a secondary analysis of the INFORM randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22 The association between PRBC >30 days old and mortality differed from secondary analyses of the Informing Fresh versus Old Red Cell Management (INFORM) study. 23 In the secondary analyses, the use of maximum PRBC age to define stored PRBCs may have overestimated the aggregate PRBC age transfused. 24 Patients transfused with predominantly fresh PRBC units, but with the addition of one PRBC unit >35 days old could inflate the number of “survivors” in the stored PRBC group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 The association between PRBC >30 days old and mortality differed from secondary analyses of the Informing Fresh versus Old Red Cell Management (INFORM) study. 23 In the secondary analyses, the use of maximum PRBC age to define stored PRBCs may have overestimated the aggregate PRBC age transfused. 24 Patients transfused with predominantly fresh PRBC units, but with the addition of one PRBC unit >35 days old could inflate the number of “survivors” in the stored PRBC group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,40 A secondary analysis of the INFORM clinical trial data which had enough data to evaluate the effect of RBCs stored >35 days did not detect differences in in-hospital mortality between patients transfused with at least one unit older than 35 days, and patients transfused with units less than 8 days; however, other clinical outcomes were not evaluated in this trial. 41 The apparent disconnect between studies could possibly in part be explained by the role that biological variability (both of donors and recipients) and processing strategies play on the development of the storage lesion and clinical outcomes. 42 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, rigorous patient selection, uniformly applied blood preparation, and transfusion practices strictly based on institutional protocols along with standardized anesthetic and surgical management helped minimize the risk for bias. Second, RBCs can be stored for as long as 35 days in South Korea; thus the impact of RBCs stored for more than 35 days were not evaluated, even though previous studies reported conflicting results regarding this issue . However, our study had advantages as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%