2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-017-2187-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of sodium hypochlorite extrusion by five irrigation systems using an artificial root socket model and a quantitative chemical method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This was in agreement with a previous study that assessed apical debris extrusion during the instrumentation of oval canals with either ProTaper Next files together with XP-endo Finisher or the self-adjusting file system and found that there was more apical extrusion of debris when XP-endo Finisher was used (42) . Also, it was proved that XP-endo Finisher resulted in apical extrusion of irrigant similar to that standard needle irrigation and significantly more than EndoVac irrigant activation technique (43) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This was in agreement with a previous study that assessed apical debris extrusion during the instrumentation of oval canals with either ProTaper Next files together with XP-endo Finisher or the self-adjusting file system and found that there was more apical extrusion of debris when XP-endo Finisher was used (42) . Also, it was proved that XP-endo Finisher resulted in apical extrusion of irrigant similar to that standard needle irrigation and significantly more than EndoVac irrigant activation technique (43) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is known that the larger the apical diameter of the teeth, the higher the risk of damage to the periapical tissues (23). As consistently evidenced, the negative pressure irrigation system considerably reduces the inadvertent apical extrusion of debris and irrigation solution (24,25), emphasizing the biologically beneficial effects of its use in immature teeth. As an additional advantage, there is a better removal of the smear layer and necrotic material from the apical third of the canal lesion (5,6,26), considered the most heavily contaminated region, especially in the presence of periapical lesion.…”
Section: Endovac In Periapical Lesion Repairmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A particular issue with PIPS is the extent of debris and NaOCl that can be extruded through the apex, when appropriate evacuation systems (such as negative apical pressure (EndoVac)), are not used simultaneously. More extrusion of material occurs using PIPS than when ultrasonic agitation is used [ 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ].…”
Section: Improvements To Irrigation Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%