2017
DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxx024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diesel Exhaust Exposure Assessment Among Tunnel Construction Workers—Correlations Between Nitrogen Dioxide, Respirable Elemental Carbon, and Particle Number

Abstract: The diesel exhaust exposure in tunnel construction work was low. A significant correlation between NO2 and EC was observed. This indicates that NO2 could be used as a proxy for diesel exhaust in tunnel work if diesel exhaust is the only source of NO2 and if the ratio between EC and NO2 is known and constant. Passive sampling of NO2 is much easier and cheaper to perform compared with active sampling of EC. It is possible to utilize self-administered NO2 measurements in extreme and inaccessible work environments… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
7
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Galea et al [ 4 ] evaluated the level of EC concentration in tunnel excavation, and the GM thereof was 18 μg/m 3 and highest GM in TBM (tunnel boring machine) tunneling activities was 37 μg/m 3 which similar to those obtained in this study. On the contrary, the study, conducted by Hedmer et al [ 12 ] on the exposure of workers to EC in construction sites of railroads tunnels showed that the workers engaged in the operation of tunnel-boring machines had exposure of 2.6 μg/m 3 of EC while the whole workplace was exposed to 11 μg/m 3 of EC, exhibiting a much lower level than those of the present study. The reason behind the decreased level of exposure to EC, compared to past data, was attributed to a decrease in the creation of particulate matters due to an advancement of recently developed diesel engines.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Galea et al [ 4 ] evaluated the level of EC concentration in tunnel excavation, and the GM thereof was 18 μg/m 3 and highest GM in TBM (tunnel boring machine) tunneling activities was 37 μg/m 3 which similar to those obtained in this study. On the contrary, the study, conducted by Hedmer et al [ 12 ] on the exposure of workers to EC in construction sites of railroads tunnels showed that the workers engaged in the operation of tunnel-boring machines had exposure of 2.6 μg/m 3 of EC while the whole workplace was exposed to 11 μg/m 3 of EC, exhibiting a much lower level than those of the present study. The reason behind the decreased level of exposure to EC, compared to past data, was attributed to a decrease in the creation of particulate matters due to an advancement of recently developed diesel engines.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported the concentration of RCS in construction sites based on typical occupations of tunnel construction worker [ 4 6 ], cement mason and concrete finisher [ 5 8 ], and building demolition [ 5 , 9 11 ]. The concentration of DEE in construction sites were reported for tunnel [ 4 , 12 , 13 ] and highway [ 14 ]. Although, the concentration levels and workers’ exposure to contaminants in tunnel and highway construction have been reported by many researchers, its evaluation for excavation works in top-down constructions is still missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As revealed by the values obtained in one of these studies [24], focused on particles ranging 10-500 nm, the number concentration was 3.9×10 5 p/cm 3 . In real conditions of particles emissions from vehicles: in car repair workshops [26], during the construction of road tunnels [27], at a bus depot [6], and in the road traffic or near busy streets [3], the concentration values were at quite different levels because of the diversity of places and different equipment used by the researchers. Nonetheless, the results of all measurements showed evident differences in the number of airborne particles emitted from vehicle engines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%