2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2016.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and molecular characterization of invasive isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes 6C and 6D in Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serogroup 6 has been recognized worldwide as an important cause of invasive and non-invasive pneumococcal diseases. Initially, it was composed of the serotypes 6A and 6B, but in recent years, additional types as 6C and less frequent 6D, 6E, 6F, 6G, and 6H have been reported [3][4][5][6]. This confirms that vaccination is often accompanied by a rise in the frequency of non-vaccine serotypes (NVTs) [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Serogroup 6 has been recognized worldwide as an important cause of invasive and non-invasive pneumococcal diseases. Initially, it was composed of the serotypes 6A and 6B, but in recent years, additional types as 6C and less frequent 6D, 6E, 6F, 6G, and 6H have been reported [3][4][5][6]. This confirms that vaccination is often accompanied by a rise in the frequency of non-vaccine serotypes (NVTs) [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The present study found that the proportion of antimicrobial agent resistance was not uniform between the serotypes; some of the antimicrobial agents, such as Spn14, Spn6C and Spn19A, have been associated with high resistance to penicillin, but the latter has been related to the clonal complex CC320, a finding similar to those reported in Brazil, Ecuador, and Belgium ( 7 , 28 , 46 , 47 ). This resistance phenomenon could be explained by the presence of circulating clones and by the pressure exerted by the use of antibiotics ( 7 , 28 , 57 , 58 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%