2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Limited evidence supports the conclusion that CSIs are superior to ABPs for pain relief in the short term; however, this result was reversed in the intermediate and long term. ABPs seemed to be more effective at restoring function in the intermediate term. Because of the small sample size and the limited number of high-quality RCTs, more high-quality RCTs with large sample sizes are required to validate this result.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, ABI allows delivery of growth factors inducing fibroblastic mitosis, triggering stem cells, and angiogenesis, probably promoting angiogenesis and collagen formation [75]. Current evidence suggests that ABI can achieve good outcome in the short term; however, no benefit has been found in the medium-or long-term follow-up [76,77]. In addition, it should be noted that ABI has high risks of injection site pain and skin reaction.…”
Section: Autologous Blood Injection (Abi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, ABI allows delivery of growth factors inducing fibroblastic mitosis, triggering stem cells, and angiogenesis, probably promoting angiogenesis and collagen formation [75]. Current evidence suggests that ABI can achieve good outcome in the short term; however, no benefit has been found in the medium-or long-term follow-up [76,77]. In addition, it should be noted that ABI has high risks of injection site pain and skin reaction.…”
Section: Autologous Blood Injection (Abi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While corticosteroid injections generally provide pain relief and the influence of PRP is more variable, 32 corticosteroids may be more effective than autologous blood products in providing short-term (up to about 12 weeks) pain relief. 54 For the intermediate term (6 months), autologous blood products appear to provide better therapeutic effect for pain relief than corticosteroids. 54 However, for longer times, such as 6 months to 1 year, while there are reported to be no differences in the extent of reduction in pain levels, 55 , 56 PRP has been reported to provide significantly greater pain relief.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 54 For the intermediate term (6 months), autologous blood products appear to provide better therapeutic effect for pain relief than corticosteroids. 54 However, for longer times, such as 6 months to 1 year, while there are reported to be no differences in the extent of reduction in pain levels, 55 , 56 PRP has been reported to provide significantly greater pain relief. 52 , 57 For pain relief due to osteoarthritis, corticosteroids are more effective than PRP, with higher corticosteroid doses inducing longer-lasting pain relief.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial search revealed 36 total articles. Of these, 9 studies 1,3,6,15,18,25,28,31,34 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and are included in this systematic review. These studies were published between 2012 and 2017, with all 9 studies performing a meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,6,12 Treatment of LE includes rest, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, splinting, physical therapy, shock wave therapy, injection therapies, and surgery, although none of these are universally effective. 1,3,6,16,18,25,28,31,34…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%