Abstract:There is currently a major concern regarding the optimal immunosuppression therapy to be administered after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to reduce both the toxicity of GvHD and the rate of relapse. We report the outcome of high-risk leukemia children transplanted with a new way of managing cyclosporine (CsA)-based GvHD prophylaxis. A total of 110 HSCT in 109 ALL or AML children who received CsA without mycophenolate or methotrexate in matched related as well as in matched or mismatched unrela… Show more
“…On subgroup analysis of age 0–20, 18,25,26,30,36 21–40, 28,31,34 and >40, 17,19,21,22,24,27,29,32,33,35 we found no difference in the effect of MRD between groups. The same was true after exclusion of studies with a high risk of bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…17–19,21,22,24–37 Details of transplant and conditioning regimens are shown in the Online Supplementary Table S3 . The sole method of MRD detection was MFC in 9 studies 22,24,26–29,33,36,37 and WT1 PCR in 5, 17,18,30–32 while one study reported results separately for MFC- and WT1 PCR-based detection. 19 Four studies used combination methods; 21,25,34,35 all of these included MFC, and 3 also included PCR-based detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Four studies used combination methods; 21,25,34,35 all of these included MFC, and 3 also included PCR-based detection. Among studies using MFC-based detection, the cut-point between MRD positivity and negativity was fairly uniform: 11 of 14 used the limit of detection for the assay (around 0.1%), while 3 specified a cutoff of 0.1%, 26,33,36 which corresponded roughly to the limit of detection in these cases. In other words, heterogeneity in cut-points was primarily determined by differences in performance characteristics and interpretation of the assay rather than the cut-points selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 11 studies, we were able to obtain HRs for all reported outcomes from the manuscript or personal communication; for the other 8 studies, HRs were extrapolated from Kaplan-Meier curves or survival point estimates (n=4). 18,26,34,36 MRD was measured within 60 days of HCT in all studies in which this information was reported, and within 30 days in all but one study. 35 …”
Minimal residual disease prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation has been associated with increased risk of relapse and death in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, but detection methodologies and results vary widely. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the prognostic role of minimal residual disease detected by polymerase chain reaction or multiparametric flow cytometry before transplant. We identified 19 articles published between January 2005 and June 2016 and extracted hazard ratios for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality. Pre-transplant minimal residual disease was associated with worse leukemia-free survival (hazard ratio=2.76 [1.90–4.00]), overall survival (hazard ratio=2.36 [1.73–3.22]), and cumulative incidence of relapse (hazard ratio=3.65 [2.53–5.27]), but not non-relapse mortality (hazard ratio=1.12 [0.81–1.55]). These associations held regardless of detection method, conditioning intensity, and patient age. Adverse cytogenetics was not an independent risk factor for death or relapse. There was more heterogeneity among studies using flow cytometry-based than WT1 polymerase chain reaction-based detection (I2=75.1% vs. <0.1% for leukemia-free survival, 67.8% vs. <0.1% for overall survival, and 22.1% vs. <0.1% for cumulative incidence of relapse). These results demonstrate a strong relationship between pre-transplant minimal residual disease and post-transplant relapse and survival. Outcome heterogeneity among studies using flow-based methods may underscore site-specific methodological differences or differences in test performance and interpretation.
“…On subgroup analysis of age 0–20, 18,25,26,30,36 21–40, 28,31,34 and >40, 17,19,21,22,24,27,29,32,33,35 we found no difference in the effect of MRD between groups. The same was true after exclusion of studies with a high risk of bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…17–19,21,22,24–37 Details of transplant and conditioning regimens are shown in the Online Supplementary Table S3 . The sole method of MRD detection was MFC in 9 studies 22,24,26–29,33,36,37 and WT1 PCR in 5, 17,18,30–32 while one study reported results separately for MFC- and WT1 PCR-based detection. 19 Four studies used combination methods; 21,25,34,35 all of these included MFC, and 3 also included PCR-based detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Four studies used combination methods; 21,25,34,35 all of these included MFC, and 3 also included PCR-based detection. Among studies using MFC-based detection, the cut-point between MRD positivity and negativity was fairly uniform: 11 of 14 used the limit of detection for the assay (around 0.1%), while 3 specified a cutoff of 0.1%, 26,33,36 which corresponded roughly to the limit of detection in these cases. In other words, heterogeneity in cut-points was primarily determined by differences in performance characteristics and interpretation of the assay rather than the cut-points selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 11 studies, we were able to obtain HRs for all reported outcomes from the manuscript or personal communication; for the other 8 studies, HRs were extrapolated from Kaplan-Meier curves or survival point estimates (n=4). 18,26,34,36 MRD was measured within 60 days of HCT in all studies in which this information was reported, and within 30 days in all but one study. 35 …”
Minimal residual disease prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation has been associated with increased risk of relapse and death in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, but detection methodologies and results vary widely. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the prognostic role of minimal residual disease detected by polymerase chain reaction or multiparametric flow cytometry before transplant. We identified 19 articles published between January 2005 and June 2016 and extracted hazard ratios for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality. Pre-transplant minimal residual disease was associated with worse leukemia-free survival (hazard ratio=2.76 [1.90–4.00]), overall survival (hazard ratio=2.36 [1.73–3.22]), and cumulative incidence of relapse (hazard ratio=3.65 [2.53–5.27]), but not non-relapse mortality (hazard ratio=1.12 [0.81–1.55]). These associations held regardless of detection method, conditioning intensity, and patient age. Adverse cytogenetics was not an independent risk factor for death or relapse. There was more heterogeneity among studies using flow cytometry-based than WT1 polymerase chain reaction-based detection (I2=75.1% vs. <0.1% for leukemia-free survival, 67.8% vs. <0.1% for overall survival, and 22.1% vs. <0.1% for cumulative incidence of relapse). These results demonstrate a strong relationship between pre-transplant minimal residual disease and post-transplant relapse and survival. Outcome heterogeneity among studies using flow-based methods may underscore site-specific methodological differences or differences in test performance and interpretation.
“…Наиболее подвержены тяжелым последствиям именно пациен-ты после ТГСК, что связано с токсическими осложне-ниями предшествующего лечения, самой процедуры ТГСК, замедленным восстановлением числа и функ-ции иммунокомпетентных клеток, развитием острой и хронической реакций «трансплантат против хозяи-на» (РТПХ), которая может преследовать пациентов в течение всей жизни [4,5]. У больных, получивших ТГСК, каждый орган может рассматриваться как «ми-шень» [6].…”
To optimize cyclosporine A (CsA) dosing regimen in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), we aimed to provide clinicians with a validated decision support tool for determining the most suitable first dose of intravenous CsA. We used a 10‐year monocentric data set of pediatric patients undergoing HSCT. Discretization of all variables was performed according to literature or thanks to algorithms using Shannon entropy (from information theory) or equal width intervals. The first 8 years were used to build the Bayesian network model. This model underwent a 10‐fold cross‐validation, and then a prospective validation with data of the last 2 years. There were 3.3% and 4.1% of missing values in the training and the validation data set, respectively. After prospective validation, the Tree‐Augmented Naïve Bayesian network shows interesting prediction performances with an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.804, 32.8% of misclassified patients, a true‐positive rate of 0.672, and a false‐positive rate of 0.285. This validated model allows good predictions to propose an optimized and personalized initial CsA dose for pediatric patients undergoing HSCT. The clinical impact of its use should be further evaluated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.